LOL!
Many Actually Retreated after Only One Night
maroons....all of 'em
There was another thread a few nights ago, with thoughts which bear repeating (thank you RobFromGa):
This is so true to form for these particular strain of hypocrite.
They want to be "human shields", but only as long as they are guaranteed to be safe; and certainly not against real "live" weapons.
All the while, real American men and women, many with families and close business associates who count on their safe return, stand in harms way in order to provide these fools with their freedom to be "virtual shields" in assistance to the enemy.
Whisc side is right? I think the answer is obvious.
Which side is more serious about this debate? Those in harms way and those who will comfort the widows of those that lose their lives are very serious in their resolve.
The opposition, represented by the "virtual shields" are, in comparison, child-like and unserious. Not yet grown-up children who Know everything (who didn't know everything at that age?), marching along aging hippies who fondly rememember the Vietnam protests, and the Hollywood money men who fund the remaining Socialists.
It's like Spring Break but it feels so much more serious and wil help your chances to be a star.
Call them what they are: "virtual shields". To qualify you need small brain, large mouth and no guts. Amd please don't muss my hair or makeup.
These ridiculous people are standing in the way of our liberation of the same population they claim to love.