Skip to comments.
The Superball Economy--In the Silicon Valley compression only sets up the economic explosion.
Wall St Journal ^
| 3-3-03
| ANDY KESSLER
Posted on 03/03/2003 4:58:39 AM PST by SJackson
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:48:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
PALO ALTO, Calif. -- It's not quite a ghost town in Silicon Valley, but the two hottest brands whose signs I see on every building are "Available" and "To Lease." Starbucks and Kinko's are filled with laid-off programmers. Despair is in the air. So fasten your seat belts, it is about time for an upturn.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Technical
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
03/03/2003 4:58:39 AM PST
by
SJackson
To: 2Fro; all_mighty_dollar; Battle Hymn of the Republic; Bullgoose; CheneyChick; cmhogan; ...
 |
Silicon Valley
 |
Send FReepmail if you want on/off SVP list |
2
posted on
03/03/2003 5:04:34 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(SOUTH American Idol)
To: SJackson
I think this guy's right... a little historical perspective:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/519186/posts
Internet II: Rebooting America: Getting Real and Getting It Right
Forbes Magazine ^ | 10 September 2001 | Michael S. Malone, Forbes ASAP, 09.10.01
3
posted on
03/03/2003 5:06:58 AM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: martin_fierro
Thanks for the ping!
Great article. I'm hoping he's right, I have lots of friends out of work and still looking.
4
posted on
03/03/2003 5:23:41 AM PST
by
LisaAnne
To: backhoe
I'll say it again: the recovery will be led by the TECH sector, and the "bust" in the tech sector was NOT all "dot.com's" and "overspeculation," but was a series of REAL WORLD difficulties, including regulatory, legal, and "last mile." These are being worked out, and will be settled.
This period in the U.S. economy is quite similar, in my view, to the 1870s when despite massive DEFLATION, some of the biggest companies in American history were forming, and the giant U.S. industrial spurt started.
5
posted on
03/03/2003 5:49:50 AM PST
by
LS
To: LS
some of the biggest companies in American history were forming,But back then they weren't forming in China, why would they form here when it's been decided that American labor costs too much and Indian programmers can do a better job being paid far less money?
6
posted on
03/03/2003 6:02:26 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
You made some really Good points there and they are TRUE as well!! UNFORTUNATELY!!
7
posted on
03/03/2003 6:32:23 AM PST
by
crazykatz
To: LS
This period in the U.S. economy is quite similar, in my view, to the 1870s That's an intriguing parallel- I think the future will be very interesting.
8
posted on
03/03/2003 6:33:02 AM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: LS
In your view, women would still be wearing heavy corsets and horses would still be the major form of transportation.
The past is past...over, gone.... we are NOT in any situation anywhere like the 1880's or 90's.... geeze, where did you get your degree in Economics????
9
posted on
03/03/2003 6:35:36 AM PST
by
crazykatz
To: backhoe
You are kidding, right?
To: SJackson
I am looking forward to this if it is true.
11
posted on
03/03/2003 6:36:50 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
To: crazykatz
Nope- dead serious.
12
posted on
03/03/2003 6:44:01 AM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
13
posted on
03/03/2003 6:54:03 AM PST
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Hope springs infernal.
14
posted on
03/03/2003 6:56:06 AM PST
by
dennisw
( http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: SJackson
Economy goes up, economy goes down. I seem to remember something in Genesis about a similar situation and a dream about storing away grain for the bad times. Not sure how many people got the message.
On a lighter note (sorta) check out the Johnny Cash video 'hurt' - kicks a$$ Link
To: LS
"...and the "bust" in the tech sector was NOT all "dot.com's" and "overspeculation,"..."Not "all", but most.
Investors went positively able-sugar over "dot coms" and threw obscene amounts of money into businesses with questionable business plans. It was if someone decided that the rules for business had simply disappeared (you know..........little things like "a company needs to actually turn a profit"). It was nuts; I was smack in the middle of it, and I kept advising my clients (I was a consultant at the time) to take heed ("......don't go stupid on me here; understand that you MUST have a business plan that "closes"; don't think you'll strike it rich by having an Internet focus only...").
It gives me zero pleasure to say that I saw it coming.......big time. When the balloon burst and tens of thousands were bounced out of work (most with huge debts), I didn't blink an eye, much as I felt for 'em.
Still...........I think the whole misnamed "dot bomb" thing was healthy. It separated the wheat from the chaff and made the world of online business grow up fast. e-commerce didn't go away; far from it. It morphed quickly into a real business model......and that sorely needed to happen.
To: SJackson
So what has 2002 set up? Beats me.Beats me, too. All I know is the only things that are the same as they were twenty years ago here in Silicon Valley are the weather & the cost of living. Everything else appears to have vamoosed.
17
posted on
03/03/2003 7:26:02 AM PST
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: LisaAnne
Thanks for the ping!
Great article. I'm hoping he's right, I have lots of friends out of work and still looking. Like me.
18
posted on
03/03/2003 7:30:31 AM PST
by
null and void
(<------ Will micromachine, do nanotech, bioMEMS for food...)
To: crazykatz
What are you talking about? Care to make sense?
19
posted on
03/03/2003 7:45:07 AM PST
by
LS
To: FITZ
Nope, you're wrong. The arguments were EXACTLY the same. "American steel can't compete against cheap European steel." So they subsidized many steel makers---but not Carnegie, who made it without subsidies. Same arguments, different countries.
20
posted on
03/03/2003 7:46:23 AM PST
by
LS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson