Skip to comments.
HILLARY HAWKS UP WAR TALK
New York Post ^
| 3/03/03
| DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 03/03/2003 1:22:34 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
March 3, 2003 -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton "fully supports" President Bush's Iraq policy, her office said last night - on the eve of her visit today to an upstate arsenal that makes military hardware like mortars and howitzers for U.S. troops.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
hillary! must be reading the polls.
1
posted on
03/03/2003 1:22:34 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
She wants to take over the world!(she's a socialist)
2
posted on
03/03/2003 1:32:10 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: kattracks
This is good news...for now. Perhaps we can gain a measure of support from the dim witted feminists now.
United we stand, divided we fall.
To: MEG33
Notice that this statement caame from her office last night, after the news that the al Qaeda biggie had been caught. All oportunist hillary! wants is to be on the winning side.
4
posted on
03/03/2003 1:37:23 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: Dec31,1999
You are right,of course, when we go to war this nation needs to pull together.I worry about those whose motives I question. Where will they be when the next Highway of Death video is shown? War is hell. Will they lose their resolve?
5
posted on
03/03/2003 1:45:14 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: kattracks
Didn't I see that b---- on the floor of the Senate excoriating Bush the other day? Seriously, who is she kidding?
6
posted on
03/03/2003 2:24:13 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 7, Staterooms As Low As $510 Per Person For Entire Week!)
To: kattracks
This "female dog" flips & flops more than a fish out of water!
7
posted on
03/03/2003 2:47:35 AM PST
by
Teetop
(democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
To: kattracks
I wonder what her hollywood friends will say about this?
Does she want war to benifit her oil rich friends?
There are a lot of questions the media needs to be asking her.
8
posted on
03/03/2003 2:57:03 AM PST
by
my right
To: my right
She never subjects herself to a tough interview.
9
posted on
03/03/2003 3:09:42 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: kattracks
She does nothing unless it is a sure thing for her, nothing. Read the polls and she how she will go, what a witch.
To: kattracks
One thing this proves is that SHE IS NOT GOING TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT! Most Democreeps don't want any of the Senators being for the war. That would be a mark against her if she ran and she knows that.
11
posted on
03/03/2003 3:38:00 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
To: kattracks
Even though she's not running(HA!), HILLARY! has just joined Lieberman and Graham as moderate democratic candidates.
Edwards is spending too much time attacking Bush and thinks it's 2004 already.
Kerry bashed Bush on Afgahnistan and is keen on wind-power and wind-up cars for the masses.
Dean is a socialist, anti-war cheerio from... VERMONT! Gephardt is... Gephardt.
Sharpton is a smart and cunning racist. Mosely-Braun asks, What am I doing here?.
But HILLARY!... God pound her, plans to be in the game while the stooges duke it out in the primaries.
12
posted on
03/03/2003 3:47:31 AM PST
by
johnny7
(You know, 4 years ago, I said that I would serve out my full term. But today, I have been called...)
To: Dec31,1999
Soon America's complacency will be gone because every citizen will be called to stand up. I wont rest until so. I agree with you 100%.
13
posted on
03/03/2003 3:54:43 AM PST
by
Kudsman
(LETS GET IT ON!)
To: kattracks
"Sen. Clinton fully supports the steps the president has taken to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction," However, during Mrs. Clinton's reign as co-president, she couldn't have cared less about WMD or terrorism. She's reinventing herself to suit her ambitions again.
14
posted on
03/03/2003 4:02:34 AM PST
by
Kathleen
To: my right
Does she want war to benifit her oil rich friends? No, No, No! Hitlery doesn't have oil rich friends. Only the evil Bushes and other Republicans have oil rich friends. You obviously haven't been reading the other posts on here where the anti-Bushes continually point these details out.
We would have been better off with the clintons or the gores under the present circumstances. The economy would be in good shape, we would have apologized to the entire muslim world, and life would be going on.
15
posted on
03/03/2003 4:17:37 AM PST
by
RushLake
To: kattracks
The beast needs to stand up on the Senate floor and state her support for the President so that the media can record her words - not go through a spokesman.
To: Dec31,1999
support from the dim witted feminists now...it's not support it's a handicapp. Sometimes you have to go it alone.
17
posted on
03/03/2003 4:20:50 AM PST
by
RWG
To: kattracks
The fact that Hillary Clinton is in The United States Senate proves that the war on terrorism is not over.
18
posted on
03/03/2003 4:23:51 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Kudsman
Your speach pattern has a tinge of The Daily Worker in it. I find it annoying. JMHO.
19
posted on
03/03/2003 4:25:23 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: kattracks
Fashion conscious democrats to lockstep over, 'cause Hillary knows the way the wind blows...
20
posted on
03/03/2003 4:31:04 AM PST
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson