Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
General Charles Horner has written (at the website below) that Turkey (Jordan and the Saudis)did not allow the US to luanch airstrikes:

"The objectives seemed fairly clear-cut: Halt, if possible, the attack on the Kurds, but definitely hit Saddam where it hurts. "Hurting" a dictator like Saddam means attacking what gives him his hold on power--his military. Presumably, top priority would be given to the Republican Guard forces arrayed on the outskirts of Irbil and to high-value (and thus well-defended) targets in and near Baghdad. Ideally, F-16s and F-15Es operating out of Turkey and Jordan would attack the Iraqi ground forces, while F-117s from Saudi Arabia would go against Baghdad.

These options never materialized. Turkey, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia probably signaled that US air strikes could not be launched from their territory. This effectively prevented us from using USAF landbased fighters and forced us to turn to our independent options: carrier airpower, bombers, and cruise missiles. http://www.afa.org/magazine/Dec1996/1296storm.html

177 posted on 03/04/2003 7:55:50 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121
Your quote came in a section titled "The Iraq crisis, September 1996, demonstrated the limits on US options." That was well after Desert Storm.

In Aug 1990, the 20th TFW (77TFS) deployed to Incirlik Turkey on a regularly scheduled weapons training deployment that turned into Desert Shield. I was one of the WSOs.
178 posted on 03/04/2003 3:16:47 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson