Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stay the course

TOP TEN INCREASES

State House/
Senate
Name Dem/
Rep
2002 2001 Life Years Change
New York H Sue Kelly R 88 40 65 8 48
Connecticut H Christopher Shays R 76 32 48 16 44
Minnesota H Jim Ramstad R 92 52 71 12 40
New York H Sherwood Boehlert R 64 32 39 20 32
New York H Amo Houghton R 62 30 54 16 32
Iowa H Jim Leach R 56 25 44 26 31
New York H Benjamin Gilman R 67 36 46 30 31
Maryland H Wayne Gilchrest R 78 48 64 12 30
Pennsylvania H Jim Greenwood R 78 48 62 10 30
Delaware H Michael Castle R 76 48 61 10 28

TOP TEN DECREASES

State House/
Senate
Name Dem/
Rep
2002 2001 Life Years Change
Pennsylvania H Frank Mascara D 20 56 31 8 -36
Texas H Solomon Ortiz D 25 60 32 20 -35
Missouri H Ike Skelton D 32 64 48 26 -32
North Dakota S Kent Conrad D 10 36 20 16 -26
West Virginia S Robert Byrd D 15 40 30 32 -25
Michigan H Dale Kildee D 8 32 12 26 -24
Pennsylvania H Mike Doyle D 8 32 24 8 -24
West Virginia H Alan Mollohan D 24 48 31 20 -24
Illinois H William Lipinski D 32 55 39 20 -23
Vermont S James Jeffords D 6 29 26 18 -23

2 posted on 02/27/2003 2:19:09 PM PST by Stay the course (primates capitulards et toujours en quĂȘte de fromages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stay the course
Pennsylvania H Pat Toomey R 100 100 97 4
Pennsylvania S Rick Santorum R 95 100 87 12
Pennsylvania S Arlen Specter R 50 56 42 22

I'll lose the formatting, but you'll get the picture... Anyone inspired to support Pat Toomey in his senate race against Arlen Specter?

3 posted on 02/27/2003 2:28:08 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Stay the course
Interesting to see that Arlen Specter has now eclipsed Lincoln Chafee to claim the mantle of most liberal Republican, and also with Judas Jim Jeffords' switch, how hard-left he went, eclipsing a large section of the 'Rats. A "6", unbelievable. We should've smelled this character a long time ago, what a joke.
4 posted on 02/27/2003 2:30:54 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~All our ZOT are belong to us~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Stay the course

STATES RANKED BY AVERAGE LIFETIME RATING

Wyoming 93.33
Idaho 93.25
Kentucky 88.25
Oklahoma 85.50
New Hampshire 85.25
Kansas 82.33
Utah 81.80
Arizona 80.75
Alabama 78.00
Nebraska 75.60
Alaska 74.00
Virginia 72.62
Mississippi 72.29
Tennessee 69.27
Colorado 68.63
South Carolina 67.25
Montana 66.67
Georgia 66.00
Louisiana 62.44
North Carolina 61.43
Indiana 61.33
Iowa 59.29
Florida 59.28
Missouri 58.36
Texas 57.56
Ohio 57.00
Nevada 54.75
Pennsylvania 54.26
New Mexico 51.80
Arkansas 50.00
Illinois 49.68
Michigan 40.50
South Dakota 39.67
California 38.41
Wisconsin 37.55
Minnesota 34.40
New Jersey 33.73
Washington 33.73
West Virginia 33.00
Delaware 32.33
Oregon 30.71
New York 30.55
Maryland 29.90
Maine 29.50
Connecticut 28.00
North Dakota 20.00
Rhode Island 16.50
Vermont 12.67
Hawaii 7.00
Massachusetts 5.42

6 posted on 02/27/2003 2:37:47 PM PST by Stay the course (primates capitulards et toujours en quĂȘte de fromages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Stay the course
Does the ACU take a Senator's or Representative's votes on abortion into consideration when handing out their rankings? The numbers suggest that they did in 2001, when the 10 pro-abortion Republicans listed in "Top Ten Increases" scored between 25 and 52 (average score, 39), while the 7 pro-life Democrats listed in "Top Ten Decreases" (all but Byrd, Conrad and Jeffords) scored between 32 and 64 (average score, 50). But in 2002, the same 10 pro-abortion Republicans scored between 56 and 92 (average score, 74), while the same 7 pro-life Democrats scored between 8 and 32 (average score, 21), which suggests that their votes on abortion were not taken into account. Given the general increase in ACU ratings in 2002 for nominal Republicans (heck, Lincoln Chafee scored a 56, for crying out loud!), I have to assume that the ACU gave more weight in 2002 to party-line votes on proposals pushed by the Democratic Senate and Republican House, respectively, than in previous years, at the expense of pro-life issues.

That helps explain why Arlen Specter's ratings were 53 in 2002 but are 42 for his career. Given the fact that all Republicans received a slight "bump" from the ACU in 2002, Specter's rating is just as pitiful as it's ever been. To Specter apologists out there, all I have to say is, go, Pat, go!
19 posted on 02/27/2003 5:28:15 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Stay the course
Does the ACU take a Senator's or Representative's votes on abortion into consideration when handing out their rankings? The numbers suggest that they did in 2001, when the 10 pro-abortion Republicans listed in "Top Ten Increases" scored between 25 and 52 (average score, 39), while the 7 pro-life Democrats listed in "Top Ten Decreases" (all but Byrd, Conrad and Jeffords) scored between 32 and 64 (average score, 50). But in 2002, the same 10 pro-abortion Republicans scored between 56 and 92 (average score, 74), while the same 7 pro-life Democrats scored between 8 and 32 (average score, 21), which suggests that their votes on abortion were not taken into account. Given the general increase in ACU ratings in 2002 for nominal Republicans (heck, Lincoln Chafee scored a 56, for crying out loud!), I have to assume that the ACU gave more weight in 2002 to party-line votes on proposals pushed by the Democratic Senate and Republican House, respectively, than in previous years, at the expense of pro-life issues.

That helps explain why Arlen Specter's ratings were 53 in 2002 but are 42 for his career. Given the fact that all Republicans received a slight "bump" from the ACU in 2002, Specter's rating is just as pitiful as it's ever been. To Specter apologists out there, all I have to say is, go, Pat, go!
21 posted on 02/27/2003 5:44:00 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson