Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amelia; Jim Robinson
Amelia, it was a curtesy ping, as one of the other people replied to mentioned you in the post I was replying to.

Thanks for keeping abreast of this topic!

That having been said, I do hope you have a very plesant day!!!

346 posted on 02/27/2003 6:26:15 AM PST by Jael (Matthew 5:13  ¶Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: Jael
Months ago, while I was trying to point out that this was not a war of religions, but rather a geopolitical power struggle within Islam and against the advent of western civilization an values into the region, the true believers in here just screamed at me that Islam was the enemy, and called me an enabler.

Months ago, while I spoke about the culpability of Saudi Arabia and the Wahabbi sect, and that we needed to address that issue, the true believers screamed that Islam was the enemy, and even called me a traitor for inviting a representative of moderate Islamic America to my show to discuss Wahabbism and their connection to international Islamic fundamentalist terrorists. I was shouted down for refusing to join the choir.

Now, you are all busy in here talking about the Wahabbis, and how they are the enemy.

Let me tell you why.

While President Bush was sending out a message to the world that this administration understood who the enemy was, and that we believed that the vast majority of Muslims would rather live in peace than wage war, the true believers and the useful idiots in this forum took every opportunity to paint the president in a negative light by using his "religion of peace" comment against him.

Now, you are taking another opportunity to paint the administration in a negative light.

If the organizations that Norquist lobbied for in DC are in fact terrorist organizations, why aren't you all spending your time putting that message out there? Why don't you spend your energy in educating the public as to who the enemy is, rather than pointing fingers at minor players in DC?

Why don't you speak out against them instead of casting aspersions at the Bush team?

The answer of course, is because the Bush team IS your ultimate target.
347 posted on 02/27/2003 6:55:28 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]

To: Jael
Months ago, while I was trying to point out that this was not a war of religions, but rather a geopolitical power struggle within Islam and against the advent of western civilization an values into the region, the true believers in here just screamed at me that Islam was the enemy, and called me an enabler.

Months ago, while I spoke about the culpability of Saudi Arabia and the Wahabbi sect, and that we needed to address that issue, the true believers screamed that Islam was the enemy, and even called me a traitor for inviting a representative of moderate Islamic America to my show to discuss Wahabbism and their connection to international Islamic fundamentalist terrorists. I was shouted down for refusing to join the choir.

Now, you are all busy in here talking about the Wahabbis, and how they are the enemy.

Let me tell you why.

While President Bush was sending out a message to the world that this administration understood who the enemy was, and that we believed that the vast majority of Muslims would rather live in peace than wage war, the true believers and the useful idiots in this forum took every opportunity to paint the president in a negative light by using his "religion of peace" comment against him.

Now, you are taking another opportunity to paint the administration in a negative light.

If the organizations that Norquist lobbied for in DC are in fact terrorist organizations, why aren't you all spending your time putting that message out there? Why don't you spend your energy in educating the public as to who the enemy is, rather than pointing fingers at minor players in DC?

Why don't you speak out against them instead of casting aspersions at the Bush team?

The answer of course, is because the Bush team IS your ultimate target.
349 posted on 02/27/2003 6:57:01 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]

To: Jael
Your unpleasantness, dishonesty and game playing are almost rivaled by your spelling skills. You rave on and on as if you are scoring points and all the while your are laughed at and only supported by a few fellow freaks.

I guess it should be no surprise. What else does a person like you have to offer?

You are obviously bent on being disliked and must get some perverse kick from it, but I just wish you would spare us the Scripture quotes and drop the Biblical name. You are not a positive representation of Christianity and trying to use your references to excuse your despicable behavior is offensive.

350 posted on 02/27/2003 7:41:05 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson