Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides
The problem with recess appointments is that judges could be forced off the bench in the middle of important cases. Lawyers would try to delay cases to get judges perceived as unfriendly off the bench before a case is tried. It would be a nightmare. It is not what the framers of our constitution intended. The best case scenerio is that Democrats are punished so severely at the polls in 2004 for their behavior towards Estrada and other judicial nominees that their members will not even consider filibustering judges despite Daschle, Leahy et al.
2,122 posted on 02/27/2003 8:10:58 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2111 | View Replies ]


To: nyconse
Lawyers would try to delay cases to get judges perceived as unfriendly off the bench before a case is tried.

Would that tactic work if there is a de facto practice of presidents reappointing recess-appointment judges to new terms? Isn't that what happens with (termed) Tax Court and bankruptcy judges today?

2,128 posted on 02/27/2003 8:31:14 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson