Skip to comments.
BIG DEM DONOR UNDER SCRUTINY: Port Authority nominee's stake in bank, campaign cash questioned
GANNETT STATE BUREAU ^
| 2/25/03
| MICHAEL SYMONS
Posted on 02/25/2003 4:07:06 AM PST by Liz
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:38:56 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
TRENTON -- Wealthy developer Charles Kushner -- Gov. McGreevey's choice to become chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey -- amended his financial disclosure statement twice last week to clarify his relationship with NorCrown Bank.
But the Senate Judiciary Committee still wants him to testify before it votes on the nomination.
(Excerpt) Read more at app.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
NorCrown Bank has 10 members of its board of directors, including Kushner. In June 2001, U.S. Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J., joined the board of directors after his retirement from the Senate. Lautenberg was re-elected to the Senate last year and is no longer on the board. Clintons got Kushner donations as did ex-Senator Torricelli. Now that he's out of work, the Torch is angling for business deals with real estate entities Kushner controls, hoping to become a developer. Torch a real estate developer? He's gonna give developers a "bad name."
1
posted on
02/25/2003 4:07:06 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
To: an amused spectator
Thanx for the link....and for keeping track of Dem donors in hot water.
3
posted on
02/25/2003 4:32:05 AM PST
by
Liz
To: eureka!
.....Mr Bundle ping..........
4
posted on
02/25/2003 4:33:54 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
And how much play will this get in the lamestream media?????
5
posted on
02/25/2003 4:45:51 AM PST
by
OldFriend
To: Liz
That letter -- which apparently would make Kushner's campaign contributions to state candidates and parties illegal Don't these clown reporters get it that it's not a lawyer's letter that "makes contributions illegal?" The facts underlying the situation do that. Geez, you think if the letter is retracted, amended or disavowed it could be legal again? Another product of our public schools this reporter no doubt is. < /yoda>
HF
6
posted on
02/25/2003 4:48:50 AM PST
by
holden
To: holden
The reporter misplaced the story's emphasis.
He should have emphasized the letter was an admission, of wrongdoing.
Amazing how these slippery shady Dems manage to wiggle out of their self-made corruption.
They all use the same MO as Clinton who is the Master of deceit.
7
posted on
02/25/2003 5:01:48 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
One of the ( to me ) surprising things about this whole mess is the attitude of Gannett Press, which can almost always be counted on to endorse Democrats, and to "smooth over", and " yes, but " any Democratic misconduct.
Gannett Press endorsed Mc Greevey - twice ; but, since his election, has actually taken the lead in exposing some of his shenanigans.
To: genefromjersey
There's been a number of FR posts on Gannett reporters piling on Democrats.....really piling it on.
9
posted on
02/25/2003 5:15:09 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Coleus
Ping. Will someone please explain why the NJ press is actually being impartial. They snuffed the Torch, exposed McGreevey's shenanigans, and now are going after the dem kingmaker.
10
posted on
02/25/2003 5:32:55 AM PST
by
MattinNJ
To: Liz
I see McSleazy is at it again.
11
posted on
02/25/2003 5:35:53 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Liz
Perhaps this is why McGreevey was amazingly conciliatory and non-confrontational on Fox two days ago, and was talking about the governors cooperating with the administration, rather than opposing them.
I thought it odd at the time, given as how the spin from the democrat governors has been that they aren't being given enough money to fight the war on terror.
To: mewzilla
Dummycrats are great at taking....and taking....and taking.
13
posted on
02/25/2003 5:54:42 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Miss Marple
FReepers inside the state say that his new wife (his second) wants to leave the marriage....
stranding the phony "family man" high and dry. How will he explain that to his constituents?
14
posted on
02/25/2003 5:57:30 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Amazing that this would come from a Gannett outfit. They own the Curious-Urinal here in Louisville. And that rag is as partisan as ever, maybe more.
15
posted on
02/25/2003 5:58:23 AM PST
by
upchuck
(Sadamn: You are on the way to destruction...you have no chance to survive, make your time..ha ha ha)
To: MattinNJ
The stench there from the mucking Dumbocrats is so foul, that somebody had to to something.
16
posted on
02/25/2003 5:59:30 AM PST
by
Liz
To: upchuck
Probably figured out the country was getting more conservative. Have to go where the readership goes.
17
posted on
02/25/2003 6:01:47 AM PST
by
Liz
To: MattinNJ
Perhaps they can't stand the smell of corruption that hangs heavy over New Jersey. Be honest! If you were offered a free week-end vacation in New Jersey with all expenses paid would you take it?
18
posted on
02/25/2003 6:07:53 AM PST
by
gaspar
To: Liz
"People who own a majority interest in a state-chartered bank are prohibited by state law from making political contributions." In fairness to Kushner, why should your investments determine whether or not you're permitted political speech?
Is that what the First Amendment says?
And that is what campaign contributions are: political speech.
19
posted on
02/25/2003 6:15:27 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: Liz
Mr. Bundle Bump. ;^)
20
posted on
02/25/2003 6:31:29 AM PST
by
eureka!
(The anti-war left has the pressholes in the bag--as long as the president is not a Rat)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson