Skip to comments.
AFL-CIO Head Urges Unions Not to Follow Members' Wishes for Presidential Nods
AP ^
| 2/24/03
| Leigh Strope
Posted on 02/24/2003 2:45:15 PM PST by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
02/24/2003 2:45:15 PM PST
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
someone please tell me when a democrat has ever helped any union member?? Helping them lose their money doesn't count.
To: cajun-jack
All parties
Tariffs - protect union jobs
3
posted on
02/24/2003 2:59:02 PM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(In those days... Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
To: JeanS
During the 2000 election there was talk of the Teamsters going for Bush. So maybe there is more to that "hold off" statement than meets the eye.
4
posted on
02/24/2003 2:59:16 PM PST
by
uncitizen
To: CyberCowboy777
abolishing the epa and osha would protect a lot of jobs....all politicians, no matter what their walk of life, becomes an expert on everything once they are elected and will pass laws screwing anyone as long as some lobbyist pony's up enough cash. The only difference between politicians and the "lot lizzards" at truck stops is....at least the "lizzards" admit they're whores.
To: JeanS
Sweeney said he wants unions "to stay unified and not to make any early decisions until they have as good an idea as possible as to where their members stand." Your headline doesn't match what the article says, you are guilty of deliberate distortion...in plain English you are a liar.
6
posted on
02/24/2003 3:13:02 PM PST
by
nofriendofbills
(Quando omni flunkus moritati)
To: *Election President
To: nofriendofbills
Check the source, this is the title AP is using.
I do not lie and I do not make up titles.
8
posted on
02/24/2003 3:14:51 PM PST
by
Jean S
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: uncitizen
Yes! The Teamsters were furious at the Dems about the failure of the Alaska Wildlife Refuge drilling bill too.
As I recall, they made some serious comments like "we'll remember this at election time"!
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: JeanS
Title and post looks fine to me.
Prairie
To: nofriendofbills
now..now....who pissed in your cheerios this morning....if you ain't got sense enough to leave the guard on a machine...well, then he probably would be a friend of yours. Everybody down south doesn't have gaps between their teeth, chew terbacky, have hair on their knuckles or 6 toes on their left feet and sleep with their cousins, BUT we do have sense enough to know how to work without the goobermint holding our hands and changing our pampers everytime we git skeered....
I'll bet you dad quit having sex with your mom after you came along because he was afraid he would mess up again.
To: nofriendofbills
Follow the source link back to the TBO site. You will see that this poster used the same title that they did.
I suggest switching to decaf. Thanks, AM
PS- if you really don't like freepers as your subsequent reply indicates, why don't you not visit this site any more? It might help your blood pressure.
To: Admin Moderator
Don't worry...looks kike he got a little involuntary vacation.
To: JeanS
Note that Hoffa isn't a trucker, but a lawyer.
I love how unions aren't even run by the employees they purport to represent. Nothing but a big leeching operation by the Democratic Party on the backs of the working American.
16
posted on
02/24/2003 3:57:11 PM PST
by
TheAngryClam
(Affirmative Action is Racism)
To: JeanS
Maybe he ought to tell the rank and file, that their dues are supporting ANSWER and Ramsey Clark's commie friends.
17
posted on
02/24/2003 5:24:31 PM PST
by
pfflier
To: JeanS
Does anyone know what the heck a "working family" is? I get so tired of hearing that term used by the Left. Is it a code word for union members? What about all their constituents who are on the dole? Would you use "working" to define that group? hah.
18
posted on
02/24/2003 5:34:06 PM PST
by
arasina
To: arasina
I am a non union conservative minded working class hourly laborer. I support the Republican/Conservative ideology. I do however have grave concern about any action taken in congress to strip the 1938 Fair Labor act of it's teeth. All proposed legeslation to trim away at it comes from the republican side of the aisle. If legeslation such as the 40 hour work week were successfully changed as has been proposed, it would have an immediate and terribly negative impact on my family's lifestyle and well being. Bush is a Neoconservative Read; (Classic Liberal) and this legislation might be vetoed by him. Hence it has not come out of commitee for two years. We know Clinton would have vetoed it.
You sound like and elitist who is out of touch with reality.
19
posted on
02/24/2003 6:07:40 PM PST
by
Magoo
(Liberalism Sucks)
To: arasina
Excellent point! A family is either a working family or a welfare family, no?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson