Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AFL-CIO Head Urges Unions Not to Follow Members' Wishes for Presidential Nods
AP ^ | 2/24/03 | Leigh Strope

Posted on 02/24/2003 2:45:15 PM PST by Jean S

HOLLYWOOD, Fla. (AP) - AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said Monday he is asking the federation's 65 member unions to hold off making presidential endorsements, even as several Democrats hopefully made their cases to union executives.

Union leaders from across the country are gathering at Diplomat Hotel and Resort this week for the AFL-CIO's winter executive council meeting.

Many of the Democrats' eight announced presidential contenders for 2004 are eager to take advantage of so many labor activists in one place and are traveling to Hollywood to court key union allies necessary for a Democrat to succeed politically.

Sweeney said he wants unions "to stay unified and not to make any early decisions until they have as good an idea as possible as to where their members stand."

Labor officials heard Monday from Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun.

"There are some candidates that have had strong ties with the labor movement for a long time," Sweeney acknowledged. "But we want to make sure that whatever step we take, that it will be with the confidence that our membership is behind."

That didn't stop Democrats from trying.

"I think they're looking for somebody who sees things through their eyes and will fight for working families," Edwards said. "I think they're looking for somebody who's really willing to take this fight to George Bush."

Moseley-Braun said she has "the vision to lead the country out of the doldrums that we are currently in. My message is one to restoring hope to the people and giving people the notion that we really can turn this economy around and put this country on the right track."

Lieberman said labor leaders want to beat Bush in 2004, and he considers himself the Democrat who can.

"The prevailing mood here is that the Bush administration has been not only a disaster in general for our economy but has particularly made life much harder for working people, middle-class Americans," Lieberman said.

Gephardt, who is spending four days here, said his visit with union officials "is going well, real well," as he left a meeting of union political directors.

Andy Stern, president of the AFL-CIO's largest union, the Service Employees International Union with 1.5 million members, said he is happy to see the candidates develop serious universal health care proposals. That's important to his union, which represents a large number of health care workers as well as low-wage workers who don't have coverage.

The Democrat who takes on President Bush in 2004 also has to "pass the hang test, which is, you've got to go out and be able to be with workers," Stern said.

In 2000, Al Gore "never really passed that test. Bush did," he said. "He puts on those boots and his belt buckles and swaggers around the ranch and tries to convince us he's just a regular old guy," Stern said.

Gephardt, a longtime labor ally, has a lot to say to union members about his record on trade and other issues important to labor. Still, he doesn't have a lock on the labor vote, although he's been more bold in recent weeks on issues such as health care, taxes and the minimum wage, to the delight of unions, Stern said.

Teamsters union officials had lunch with Gephardt on Monday. He and Teamsters President James P. Hoffa are longtime friends, and both attended law school at the University of Michigan.

"None of the candidates are any better on our issues than Gephardt," political director Mike Mathis said. He said his union will poll members in early primary states in the next month before it decides when and if it will endorse.

Former Vermont governor Howard Dean, expected Tuesday, also is generating a lot of interest. "What he believes in he's not afraid of," said Stern. He likened Dean to Sen. John McCain, whose no-nonsense style attracted a large number of independent voters in the 2000 GOP presidential primary.

---

AP Writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

On the Net: AFL-CIO: http://www.aflcio.org

Teamsters: http://www.teamsters.org

AP-ES-02-24-03 1716EST


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2003 2:45:15 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
someone please tell me when a democrat has ever helped any union member?? Helping them lose their money doesn't count.
2 posted on 02/24/2003 2:48:34 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack
All parties

Tariffs - protect union jobs
3 posted on 02/24/2003 2:59:02 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (In those days... Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
During the 2000 election there was talk of the Teamsters going for Bush. So maybe there is more to that "hold off" statement than meets the eye.
4 posted on 02/24/2003 2:59:16 PM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
abolishing the epa and osha would protect a lot of jobs....all politicians, no matter what their walk of life, becomes an expert on everything once they are elected and will pass laws screwing anyone as long as some lobbyist pony's up enough cash. The only difference between politicians and the "lot lizzards" at truck stops is....at least the "lizzards" admit they're whores.
5 posted on 02/24/2003 3:10:03 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Sweeney said he wants unions "to stay unified and not to make any early decisions until they have as good an idea as possible as to where their members stand."

Your headline doesn't match what the article says, you are guilty of deliberate distortion...in plain English you are a liar.

6 posted on 02/24/2003 3:13:02 PM PST by nofriendofbills (Quando omni flunkus moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Election President
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
7 posted on 02/24/2003 3:14:37 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nofriendofbills
Check the source, this is the title AP is using.
I do not lie and I do not make up titles.
8 posted on 02/24/2003 3:14:51 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: uncitizen
Yes! The Teamsters were furious at the Dems about the failure of the Alaska Wildlife Refuge drilling bill too.

As I recall, they made some serious comments like "we'll remember this at election time"!
10 posted on 02/24/2003 3:16:56 PM PST by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
Title and post looks fine to me.

Prairie
12 posted on 02/24/2003 3:21:23 PM PST by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nofriendofbills
now..now....who pissed in your cheerios this morning....if you ain't got sense enough to leave the guard on a machine...well, then he probably would be a friend of yours. Everybody down south doesn't have gaps between their teeth, chew terbacky, have hair on their knuckles or 6 toes on their left feet and sleep with their cousins, BUT we do have sense enough to know how to work without the goobermint holding our hands and changing our pampers everytime we git skeered....

I'll bet you dad quit having sex with your mom after you came along because he was afraid he would mess up again.

13 posted on 02/24/2003 3:22:44 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nofriendofbills
Follow the source link back to the TBO site. You will see that this poster used the same title that they did.

I suggest switching to decaf. Thanks, AM

PS- if you really don't like freepers as your subsequent reply indicates, why don't you not visit this site any more? It might help your blood pressure.

14 posted on 02/24/2003 3:27:51 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Don't worry...looks kike he got a little involuntary vacation.
15 posted on 02/24/2003 3:47:18 PM PST by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Note that Hoffa isn't a trucker, but a lawyer.

I love how unions aren't even run by the employees they purport to represent. Nothing but a big leeching operation by the Democratic Party on the backs of the working American.
16 posted on 02/24/2003 3:57:11 PM PST by TheAngryClam (Affirmative Action is Racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Maybe he ought to tell the rank and file, that their dues are supporting ANSWER and Ramsey Clark's commie friends.
17 posted on 02/24/2003 5:24:31 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Does anyone know what the heck a "working family" is? I get so tired of hearing that term used by the Left. Is it a code word for union members? What about all their constituents who are on the dole? Would you use "working" to define that group? hah.
18 posted on 02/24/2003 5:34:06 PM PST by arasina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina
I am a non union conservative minded working class hourly laborer. I support the Republican/Conservative ideology. I do however have grave concern about any action taken in congress to strip the 1938 Fair Labor act of it's teeth. All proposed legeslation to trim away at it comes from the republican side of the aisle. If legeslation such as the 40 hour work week were successfully changed as has been proposed, it would have an immediate and terribly negative impact on my family's lifestyle and well being. Bush is a Neoconservative Read; (Classic Liberal) and this legislation might be vetoed by him. Hence it has not come out of commitee for two years. We know Clinton would have vetoed it.

You sound like and elitist who is out of touch with reality.

19 posted on 02/24/2003 6:07:40 PM PST by Magoo (Liberalism Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Excellent point! A family is either a working family or a welfare family, no?
20 posted on 02/24/2003 6:41:33 PM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson