Posted on 02/22/2003 2:36:02 PM PST by sarcasm
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - In defiance of the United States and Spain, U.N. Security Council member Mexico vowed on Saturday to maintain its opposition to an attack on Iraq.
``I want to reiterate that Mexico's position has been and will be very clear. It will exclusively serve our interests, the interests of the Mexicans and no-one else,'' said Interior Minister Santiago Creel.
Mexico, which has a porous 2,000-mile border with the United States, was cooperating closely in the fight against terrorism but would chart its own course in the Iraq crisis, he told reporters.
Mexico has called for U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq to be given more time to carry out their mission.
``That is going to be the position we will assume. In matters of internal security: total solidarity against terrorism, total proximity with our northern neighbor,'' Creel said. ``And in international forums: our principles, our traditions and above all, Mexico's peaceful vocation.''
His comments came after a plea by the U.S. ambassador for Mexico to prove its friendship to the United States, the recipient of almost 90 percent of Mexico's exports.
The United States and countries supporting it are to submit a proposed resolution to the Security Council early next week declaring Iraq is not complying with U.N. disarmament demands.
The resolution is expected to carry a threat of military action if Iraq does not comply quickly.
U.N. diplomats say the votes of non-permanent Security Council members like Mexico are key because Washington wants to win the minimum nine votes needed in the council for adoption of the resolution and then challenge Russia, China or France to use their powers of veto to kill it.
AZNAR FAILS
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, one of the staunchest U.S. allies in the Iraq crisis, failed to convince Mexican President Vicente Fox to back the resolution during a visit to Mexico on Thursday.
Fox, a former Coca-Cola executive who was once close to President Bush, released a short statement after that meeting which feel well short of offering support.
In a breach of diplomatic dress code, the Mexican president received Aznar for talks at his official residence wearing a black leather jacket and open-necked shirt -- a signal to the Spanish leader that Fox is in dissent.
Mexico is upset at the United States' lack of interest in talks to legalize the status of millions of undocumented Mexicans in the United States.
The immigration issue has been the cornerstone of a Mexican bid to align itself closer with the United States, but it fell of the agenda because of U.S. concerns about security after the Sept. 11 attacks on American cities.
Mexico now feels spurned and believes it has little to lose politically by turning its back on Washington, analysts say.
``I think perhaps Mexico may be at the point where it says, 'We are not going to get what we want out of the United States anyway, so there will not be such a high prices to pay,''' said Delal Baer of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Mexican newspapers on Saturday quoted U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Tony Garza as asking for Mexican diplomatic help. ``The real test of (a) special relationship is helping each other in difficult times,'' Garza was quoted as saying.
In a veiled threat, he warned that an immigration deal with the United States ``could become impossible'' in Congress if Mexico did not back Washington over Iraq.
Dear Presidente Fox.....get ready for payback time...
No pun intended!
Mexico is upset at the United States' lack of interest in talks to legalize the status of millions of undocumented Mexicans in the United States.
So, let me get this right: Mexico is allowed to exclusively serve its own interests. But, the United States is expected to exclusively serve the interests of Mexico too?
How is it in the interest of the United States to add millions of undocumented Mexicans to the American welfare rolls?
But if Mexico is not going to help us fully with terrorism, then the joke-of-a-border is going to become a major liability, and I'd fully support bringing the hammer down hard on Mexican illegal immigration.
Why does the number 90% spring to mind when I read this? Must have read it somewhere.
Possibly true.
But, isn't that *because* they are illegal and don't qualify for welfare benefits?
What happens when Uncle Sugar gives them a blank check?
Maybe, and this is a very good answer IMO, but Mexico surely knows that the US will take out Saddam regardless of how it votes. So why not vote in favor of the US, a vote that may help Mexico down the line on other issues in which it is interested?
These folks in charge down in the south part of the United States (Mexico by another name), sure must be principled to the point that they would be willing to risk worsening relations with a trading partner that accounts for 90% of their exports. Either that or they are quite certain that the idiots to the north will never take action that would put them in jeopardy.
Not looking for a flame war with anyone, but I wonder how far GW will go to pander to the Tex/Mexicalli voter?
Maybe other Americans DO want those jobs. But they can't get them because the companies that hire these illegal aliens have undercut American workers by paying the illegal aliens lower wages and little or no benefits. Also, illegal alien workers tend to keep their mouths shut and work reasonably hard because they know that their employer can report them to the INS at any time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.