To: Quix
My understanding is that the linguistic confirmations have been fairly extensive.
Speaking as someone who works in the field, "extensive" is hardly the term I'd use to describe the linguistic links. "Absurdly speculative" would probably be better.
183 posted on
02/21/2003 9:20:26 PM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Antoninus
You must be right. I'm not the expert and it's been many months since I read the stuff. I'll try and look it up again next week.
195 posted on
02/21/2003 11:18:47 PM PST by
Quix
(OTHER TASKS DELAY ME BUT STILL PLANNING TO GET KATHLEEN'S FINAL WARNING EXCERPTS UP)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson