Skip to comments.
Bill Clinton: Next U.N. chief? Report: Former president eyed to replace Kofi Annan
World Net Daily ^
| Friday Feb 19/03
| WorldNetDaily
Posted on 02/21/2003 8:53:48 AM PST by philosofy123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
To: philosofy123
One thing I know about FR is the fact that many events take place with us already having a heads-up, sometimes years in advance.
Xlin-Ton would make a good UN secgen. He's well-practiced at giving our list of current terrorist regimes every advantage possible to wage war against us domesticaly and abroad. Marxists have tended to do that throughout our history.
Support prop 1146.
101
posted on
02/21/2003 2:46:28 PM PST
by
martian_22
(Clintonism is a psychopathology.)
To: Capt.YankeeMike
Clinton makes me vomit the way he is claiming how great a job he did in N.Korea.
The scum left a huge mess all around.
To: LiteKeeper
To: philosofy123
bill clinton would not what abiding by the law was if it bit him on the ass.
104
posted on
02/21/2003 6:53:19 PM PST
by
sport
To: dd5339
World Net Daily's credibility continues to sink even lower!What is it internet media sweeps week? I keep waiting for World Net Daily to rename itself World Equirer Daily.
105
posted on
02/21/2003 7:58:51 PM PST
by
Katya
To: jacksonstate
Can you say "ANTI-CHRIST!!!!!My first thought.
To: Vic3O3
Wait a minute folks--just supposing WJC got the UN job (even though currently he can't qualify)can't you see how perfect this is?? It's just the thing we need to GET US OUT of the UN! And what poetic justice--we stick the UN with our biggest sleazeball! And this sums up my second thought.
To: philosofy123
Please, someone explain to me why charges have not been brought against Clinton? And I don't mean the adultry/purgery stuff. I mean the national security issues and creative accounting stuff during his reign.
To: Numbers Guy
I'm always amazed everytime one of these articles pops up. The people who report the stories should know better and the very smart and informed members of FR know better, but they just keep coming.
109
posted on
02/21/2003 8:54:51 PM PST
by
PFKEY
To: Howlin
Where has this 'Clinton wanting to be UN President' been discredited? Please post URL's. Just because it is a far fetched Clinton ideal does not make it unfeasible because someone does not like WND. WND got this info from a Pittsburgh newspaper. Do you also discredit/brush off the Pittsburgh paper?
Please post links to counter this article.
To: Howlin
Please see post 110.
Since when has the U.S. had any 'power' over the United Nations?
If the U.S. could 'veto', as you stated, the U.N.; we would not be kissing the U.N.'s butts off right now playing politics and holding up our troops, in begging for a 'U.S. decided' war on terrorism?
To: Howlin
Re: the Pittsburgh newspaper I referenced. See post 48.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
