Skip to comments.
3,000 Troops to be Sent to Combat Muslim Militants in the Philippines
Washington Post ^
Posted on 02/20/2003 3:46:10 PM PST by RCW2001
Thursday, February 20, 2003; 6:41 PM
The United States is sending about 3,000 troops to join with Philippine forces in a major new combat offensive in the southern Philippines aimed at wiping out the militant Muslim group Abu Sayyaf, Pentagon officials said today.
The move marks the second time in less than a year that the Bush administration has committed a significant number of U.S. forces to try to root out the extremist group that has continued to unsettle the Philippines and target Americans in the islands.
Last year, nearly 1,300 U.S. advisers and support personnel participated in what was billed as a six-month training mission to bolster the counterterrorism capabilities of Philippine forces. That effort, which focused on the island of Basilan and concluded on July 31, was credited with killing or capturing some Abu Sayyaf members, but it also ended up scattering scores of rebels to other islands.
This time, Pentagon officials are describing the mission not as a training exercise but a combat operation with no pre-set termination date. Although Philippine forces will have the lead, they will be accompanied in the field by American troops that will remain under U.S. command and be at some risk, defense officials said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: fareast; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
02/20/2003 3:46:10 PM PST
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
...we will root them out wherever they hide.......
2
posted on
02/20/2003 3:47:07 PM PST
by
seams2me
("if they pass the reading test, it means they learned to read" GWB 1/8/03)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: seams2me
Based on personal experience hunting armed men in jungle is a very difficult job with a pucker factor of about 9.9. Good luck and God Bless.
Don't get me wrong, I'm for it and it'll work. Any one out there old enough to remember the war against the Huks in the Phillipines several decades ago.
To: RCW2001
Go Bush! Go troops!
To: *Far East; *TerrOrWar
To: RCW2001
Pretty soon........all of our troops will be gone......
great.......NOT! ........then what UN Peacekeepers here to the rescue.....I think not.......
remember after 9-11........NATO planes "watched" over our air space for us...........the end is near!!!!!!!!
7
posted on
02/20/2003 4:08:48 PM PST
by
Faith65
To: JeeperFreeper
Philippines, Viet Nam...jungles are bad news...don't like the smell of this mission...God speed our troops! Semper Fi
8
posted on
02/20/2003 4:10:37 PM PST
by
kellynla
(Once a Marine...)
To: RCW2001
I think that this is a big deal that the Phillippines are letting us come in, especially under our own command.
I seem to remember that they had some specific legal prohibition against this very kind of action.
9
posted on
02/20/2003 4:14:19 PM PST
by
VMI70
To: RCW2001
Here we go again ...
10
posted on
02/20/2003 4:15:03 PM PST
by
11th_VA
To: RCW2001
"Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes visible on TV and covert operations secret even in success." -President George W. Bush
11
posted on
02/20/2003 4:16:38 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(tm)
To: All
BTW - Rainy season starts in March. You can march thru the jungle without being heard...
12
posted on
02/20/2003 4:18:30 PM PST
by
11th_VA
To: RCW2001
Do you suppose this action will result in the U.S. Army re-adopting a .45 calliber pistol???
To: JeeperFreeper
I think that was 100 years ago- shrotly after the Spanish American war- and it was a brutal nasty war with atrocities committed on both sides.
To: Lion Den Dan
Actually- I think the .45 caliber was first adopted during the first Phillipines war 100 years ago.
To: VMI70
I seem to remember that they had some specific legal prohibition against this very kind of action. There are. Under their constitution, our forces may not engage in direct combat. However, self defense is authorized, as is accompanying the AFP on armed patrols.
I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you. Oh, you shot at me, now I can shoot back.
To: Burkeman1
Army reports from the time showed that lower caliber handguns were not particularly successful in stopping Moro combatants. The .45 has considerably more 'stopping power', and was much more effective.
The Phillipine Insurrection was a very bloody affair. The local Moros noted that "Attacking an American is like setting off one firecracker in a link. They'll all go off if you attack one." The culture down there is unbelievably violent, the eradication of slavery a very recent affair, and they are known in the region as pirates, criminals, and bullies.
To: Burkeman1
Actually- I think the .45 caliber was first adopted during the first Phillipines war 100 years ago That's true ... and most of the officers tried to go with a Colt .45 before the 1911 arrived.
18
posted on
02/20/2003 4:48:05 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
To: Steel Wolf
Yes- not a very admirable people from all I have heard- bullies- murderers- pirates- and thieves.
To: RCW2001
Why the hell do we need to do this? Doesn't the Phillippine army have enough troops for gods sake?
20
posted on
02/20/2003 5:09:53 PM PST
by
zarf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson