[farmer18th]

Now don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with being insecure.

What patronizing bilge. It seems to me that evolutionists should at least own up to the insecurity, or at least the humility, that should attend an attempt to explain events which can't be witnessed. To characterize an objection to the mathematically absurd and deterministically impossible sequence of events that would have to occur in an evolutionary sequence as a desire to remain insecure is more than just childish. It's depraved...

[Ichneumon]

It seems to me that evolutionists should at least own up to the insecurity, or at least the humility, that should attend an attempt to explain events which can't be witnessed.

I'm sorry, you seem to have evolutionists, who study things that can actually be studied and researched, with the creationists, who are the masters of "attempting to explain events which can't be witnessed" (i.e. alleged miracles), yet who have absolutely no humility about it at all.

To characterize an objection to the mathematically absurd and deterministically impossible sequence of events that would have to occur in an evolutionary sequence

I'm sorry, you have failed to provide supporting evidence for your mathematical estimation. Do try again.

as a desire to remain insecure is more than just childish. It's depraved...

Seems like it might have a grain or two of truth, though, from what I've seen of their behavior.