Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cracks in the Estrada Filibuster?
The Hill ^ | 2/20/03 | Byron York

Posted on 02/20/2003 12:30:46 PM PST by votelife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: deport
What was Estrada doing in the Clinton Justice Department? Maybe conservatives ought to want to see this material.
41 posted on 02/20/2003 1:17:06 PM PST by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: votelife
It really ticked me off that Frist and the other Repubs didn't force the Dems to keep talking 24 x 7 right through the break. Thought the guy had some backbone. Guess I was wrong.
42 posted on 02/20/2003 1:18:47 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
"Would Estrada win a straight 'up/down' vote?"

It only takes 51 votes....
We have 51 Pubbies and if a vote is taken,
several RATS will also jump back on the ship....


43 posted on 02/20/2003 1:25:29 PM PST by TRY ONE (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
The fact that he worked for Clinton IS concerning. Maybe he worked for Clinton for resume padding to help the confirmation. He is a good friend of Ann Coulter's and he is thanked in the front of her book Slander. And Coulter told Begala on Crossfire that "He'll turn over everything you love." So, I give Estrada the full benefit of the doubt. Bump for Estrada!
44 posted on 02/20/2003 1:26:08 PM PST by votelife (Free Miguel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
FREEPers, I have created the ultimate Estrada activism thread. On it you will find ways to contact Senators, newsspapers, radio/tv people, organizations etc. Go there and help support Estrada. Keep the thread bumped until we get him confirmed.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/847037/posts
45 posted on 02/20/2003 1:26:42 PM PST by votelife (Free Miguel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
. . . if democrats were to succeed it would politicize the Justice department and they know it. Their purpose, therefore, is to destroy the government of the United States.

This is just the latest manifestation of that goal. They'll keep trying.

46 posted on 02/20/2003 1:31:50 PM PST by mombonn (Never misunderestimate President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
Orignally brought in under the Bush Admin and left in 1997 I think......


47 posted on 02/20/2003 1:35:05 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
We need Hispanics...writing Letters to the Editor in cities like Miami with high Hispanic population...complaining about "Democrats bigotry toward Hispanics"...

If enough did this, it should solve the problem.

By the way, Hispanics DID pass blacks as the largest minority in the US.....recently announced in the media.

48 posted on 02/20/2003 1:37:58 PM PST by Gopher Broke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
It really ticked me off that Frist and the other Repubs didn't force the Dems to keep talking 24 x 7 right through the break. Thought the guy had some backbone. Guess I was wrong.

You obviously haven't been playing close attention, because this issue has been discussed several times in various threads here.

Frist recessed the session for several reasons. First, because McConnell was recovering from surgery, and at least one other seator had a wife undergoing surgery, Frist was not assured of having the majority needed to keep the Senate in session in the event the Dems moved to adjourn. Second, and most important, he wanted to use this week to do just what the Republicans have been doing - building opposition to a filibuster within the Hispanic community. That is why you saw the news conference yesterday by those Hispanic groups supporting Estrada. That is why ads opposing the filibuster have been appearing on Hispanic radio and TV stations, and in Spanish publications. That is why you saw GWB appear on Telemundo to talk about the nomination. They are trying hard to prevent the Democrats from establishing a precedent by forcing this to a full-blown filibuster. If this week allows the Republicans to peel away a few more vulnerable Dems, the whole thing will fall apart by the time they get back into session, and they can proceed with a vote. If not, then they can go into an all-out filibuster and win by wearing down the Dems.

This may not be the way you would like to see things done, but by all of the stories we are seeing, it looks like it may be working, and that is what matters.

49 posted on 02/20/2003 1:41:58 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Just sent a letter (a real letter not an email) to Russ Feingold

Good luck with any response. My husband and I throughout the years have penned many letters to our leftist Senator (both "real" letters and emails) and the only response we have ever recieved from him was the one email back to my husband stating that he was sorry, but he only had enough time to respond to his own constituents. Mind you we live in Mid Wisconsin. My husband promptly sent him a state map with our town highlighted, and asked him when Waupaca had ceceded from Wisconsin. He never replied.

I also once got an automated response saying that he had recieved my email, but nothing more. He is worthless.

50 posted on 02/20/2003 1:42:23 PM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: votelife
That is why I appealed to his sense of fairness. He may be just another lyin' commie craphead but at times has gone against the leadership. Also he was not exactly following the RAT line on impeachment when the Abomination was on trial.
51 posted on 02/20/2003 1:43:33 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Islame has had its day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
easy...working for the Solicitor General...like Bork was once...it has little to do with ideological background.
52 posted on 02/20/2003 1:44:59 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Not only are you wrong but can't see the value of these idiots displaying their idiocy for all to see. Let them filibuster until the cows come home. It will not help them.
53 posted on 02/20/2003 1:45:02 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Islame has had its day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: votelife
The fact that he worked for Clinton IS concerning.

Estrada was a career lawyer in the Soliciter General's office, not a political appointee. He also worked in the SG's office during Bush I. And I am sure you would find some things in the briefs he wrote during that time that you would not like. Just keep in mind, it was his job to represent and defend the position of his client, in this case, the Clinton Administration, not to argue his own beliefs and principles.

54 posted on 02/20/2003 1:45:19 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Ann Coulter supports and knows him. Good enough for me.
55 posted on 02/20/2003 1:47:14 PM PST by votelife (Free Miguel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
I think the terror scare regarding assassinations of congresscritters made him do it. Just MHO, of course.
56 posted on 02/20/2003 1:47:32 PM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
It really ticked me off that Frist and the other Repubs didn't force the Dems to keep talking 24 x 7 right through the break. Thought the guy had some backbone.


One question.... Where will the 51 Senators come from when the democrats call for a quorum? If you can supply 51 Senators for a Quorum call then you can keep the senate in session, if not..... then it's adjourn or recess...
57 posted on 02/20/2003 1:49:59 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
Interesting. I have written him several times and have received responses twice. On those occassions I also wrote dozens of Senators and at least half of them responded. Some were totally canned and some were specific responses. Monyhan was always good for a thoughtful response.

Not that I care whether I do or not this time.
58 posted on 02/20/2003 1:56:19 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Islame has had its day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
the only response we have ever recieved from him was the one email back to my husband stating that he was sorry, but he only had enough time to respond to his own constituents.

Mind you we live in Mid Wisconsin. My husband promptly sent him a state map with our town highlighted, and asked him when Waupaca had ceceded from Wisconsin. He never replied.

LOL.

Your husband has quite a sense of humor.

My Florida senators usually do answer a personalized letter, but I know it was written by their staff.

59 posted on 02/20/2003 1:56:37 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
What was Estrada doing in the Clinton Justice Department?

He was??? That doesn't sound very Conservative.

60 posted on 02/20/2003 1:59:00 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson