Posted on 02/20/2003 9:31:20 AM PST by Enemy Of The State
U.S. 2002 Trade Deficit Reaches $435.2B By MARTIN CRUTSINGER
WASHINGTON (AP) - The United States recorded a $435.2 billion trade deficit for 2002, the largest imbalance in history, as the weak global economy set back American exports while imports of autos and other consumer goods were hitting all-time highs. In other economic news, the Labor Department reported Thursday that inflation at the wholesale level shot up by 1.6 percent in January, the biggest increase in 13 years, led by a sharp 4.8 percent rise in energy costs. Even though the surge was concentrated in energy, prices of other items such as new cars showed big advances as well and the overall increase was certain to raise concerns about whether inflation, which has been well-behaved for years, was threatening to get out of control. The government will report on January consumer prices on Friday. In a third report, the government said that the number of newly laid off workers filing unemployment claims jumped to a seven-week high of 402,000 last week, up by 21,000 from the previous week, showing that the labor market is still struggling with an uneven economic recovery.
The trade report showed that even in agricultural products, normally a U.S. bulwark, Americans bought more imported wine, cheese and other foods than American farmers were able to sell abroad - resulting in only the second U.S. trade deficit in farm goods on record. The Commerce Department reported Thursday that the deficit for all of last year was up 21.5 percent from the $358.3 billion trade gap recorded in 2001 and surpassed the old record deficit of $378.7 billion set in 2000. By country, the United States ran up the largest trade gap with China, a deficit of $103.1 billion, marking the third straight year that the United States has recorded its largest trade deficit with that nation. It pushed the former front-runner in this category, Japan, into second place. In addition to the record for all of 2002, the United States set a new monthly high of $44.2 billion in December, up 10.5 percent from the previous record set in November of $40.0 billion. Opponents of President Bush's trade policies contend that the huge trade deficits represent the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs as U.S. companies have been battered by what the critics say is unfair competition from low-wage countries that stifle labor rights and have lax environmental protections.
American manufacturing companies have been lobbying for the Bush administration to drop its support for a strong dollar policy, arguing that an overpriced dollar has made their goods noncompetitive in foreign markets while opening them to a flood of competition from cheaper priced imports. Treasury Secretary John Snow, who was meeting with British finance officials on Thursday on his way to a weekend meeting in Paris of America's major economic allies, insisted during his Senate confirmation hearing that the administration intends to make no change in its strong dollar policy. A strong U.S. dollar makes investments in U.S. stocks and bonds more attractive to foreigners. For 2002, exports of goods and services fell 2.5 percent to $973 billion, marking the second consecutive annual decline, as American exporters found it increasingly difficult to sell overseas. This reflected a spreading global economic slowdown and the strong dollar. American manufacturers were the hardest hit sector of the economy during the 2001 recession with a loss of nearly 2 million workers. While the economy began a recovery in 2002, the progress has been uneven and so far it has not resulted in a rebound in hiring. American imports, which fell 6 percent in 2001, reflecting the U.S. recession, staged a rebound in 2002, rising by 3.8 percent to $1.41 trillion. That, however, was still below the all-time high of $1.44 trillion set in 2000. But in individual categories, imports of autos and auto parts set a record high $203.9 billion and imports of other consumer goods, a category that includes everything from clothes to televisions and toys, also hit a record high of $307.7 billion last year. Imports of oil totaled $103.6 billion last year, basically unchanged from the level in 2001. After China, deficits with other countries included imbalances of $$70.1 billion with Japan; $49.8 billion with Canada and $37.2 billion with Mexico. On the export side, manufactured goods suffered a setback but sales of American farm products managed to eke out a tiny 0.3 percent increase to $49.54 billion last year over the 2001 level. However, imports of farm products rose a much faster 6.6 percent to $49.72 billion, representing in a deficit in farm trade of $176 million, the second such deficit in history. Farm imports topped exports in 1986 as well. |
When is a service not a service? When it's a benefit. So, are benefit services better or worse than just plain services?
What if a manufactured good is a benefit, like a company car? Is that better or worse than just a regular car?
They should cut taxes but they must also cut government spending especially on welfare programs ---I haven't seen any plans of that. Cutting taxes so people can buy foreign products won't help the US economy at all, it won't create a single American job. A tax cut to induce spending helps China even more and makes the trade deficit higher.
Makes absolutely no difference if it's unaffordable.
If it's unaffordable, then it'll no longer exist.
What about the welfare class? Is their share the same amount? If so then you'd have to add their share in with those of the working class because the welfare class can't pay theirs.
It's the same amount for everybody, regardless of class.
If so then you'd have to add their share in with those of the working class because the welfare class can't pay theirs.
Yep, I'm afraid so. Gonna get stuck supporting them one way or the other.
My preference, though, is to downsize government welfare and promote domestic manufacturing to provide the welfare class opportunity to earn their keep.
I agree completely.
Cutting taxes so people can buy foreign products won't help the US economy at all, it won't create a single American job.
You sound like Clinton, you only like it when people spend money the way you think is best. Whatever happened to freedom?
A tax cut to induce spending helps China even more and makes the trade deficit higher.
So, we should raise taxes? The amount of money spent on Chinese or any foreign good is a relatively small part of the economy (about 11% of GDP). You'd sacrifice the 89% that would be spent on U.S. goods?
A trade deficit isn't automatically bad, a trade surplus isn't automatically good.
Actually, they have, if you bother to look at the stats. Our exports have more than doubled in the last 10 years but its not our fault our competitors can't afford more because they are socialistic and protectionist.
I don't know ---it seems the Communists have won because our government has given them all our jobs and our entire economy. We're supporting Communist economies, freedom is gone.
It appears that's more your specialty: babble some irrelevant and incoherent nonsense, then turn around and belittle those who dismiss you.
Buzz off, I'm not playing your game today.
They've had what, 10 years of recession in the last 13 or so. They now have the largest government deficit compared to GDP of all the industrialized countries.
Still waiting for your wisdom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China Says Economy Grew 8.0 Pct in 2002
'China to Replace US as the Engine for World Economy'
Fundamentally, we believe that the U.S. government needs to devote more resources and put in place new programs to build wider expertise about China and to protect our industrial base from eroding as a result of our economic relations with China.
-- C. Richard DAmato, chairman
U.S.-China Security Review Commission
(How to improve U.S.-China relations )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.