I agree. I have a few thoughts about this...
I haven't read that 1 veto from the Security Council would preclude him from the nomination, but I don't think he would be pursuing this course of action unless he knew that he could still be nominated regardless of whether the U.S. cast a veto. I am sure that the Klintoon's would blame the VRC and President Bush.
If he is nominated and appointed, that would be great. If he gets appointed and President Bush is still President, he will take action against President Bush.
When I mean action, I am not talking about blocking Bush's agenda. That is to be expected. In fact, that is all the B*tch with a capital "C" (D-NY) has done since elected to the Senate.
What I am talking about would be a military action against the U.S. sactioned, of course, by the UN. He would do have to do this to appease all of his two-bit dictator supporters in the UN. You know that he would do this, because the man is an empty suit; he has a void inside of him that he fills with the adoration of others. He has no integrity, so he has to derive his self worth by pleasing as many people as possible, regardless of the person or traditions he has destroy to do that.
When he takes action against the U.S., the President will (rightly) declare him a traitor to his country. At that point, his citizenship would be revoked and he would be someone else's problem.
The arguements have abounded for years to get rid of the UN. The appointment of Bubba Klintoon and his expected anti-American sentiments would soldify the ultimate disolution of this body.
This is a reason why he wouldn't do it: because he and the UN would become (rightfully) irrelevant.