I agree. I have a few thoughts about this...
I haven't read that 1 veto from the Security Council would preclude him from the nomination, but I don't think he would be pursuing this course of action unless he knew that he could still be nominated regardless of whether the U.S. cast a veto. I am sure that the Klintoon's would blame the VRC and President Bush.
If he is nominated and appointed, that would be great. If he gets appointed and President Bush is still President, he will take action against President Bush.
When I mean action, I am not talking about blocking Bush's agenda. That is to be expected. In fact, that is all the B*tch with a capital "C" (D-NY) has done since elected to the Senate.
What I am talking about would be a military action against the U.S. sactioned, of course, by the UN. He would do have to do this to appease all of his two-bit dictator supporters in the UN. You know that he would do this, because the man is an empty suit; he has a void inside of him that he fills with the adoration of others. He has no integrity, so he has to derive his self worth by pleasing as many people as possible, regardless of the person or traditions he has destroy to do that.
When he takes action against the U.S., the President will (rightly) declare him a traitor to his country. At that point, his citizenship would be revoked and he would be someone else's problem.
The arguements have abounded for years to get rid of the UN. The appointment of Bubba Klintoon and his expected anti-American sentiments would soldify the ultimate disolution of this body.
This is a reason why he wouldn't do it: because he and the UN would become (rightfully) irrelevant.
The United States Constitution
Article XIV.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
It would be hard to take away Bill’s citizenship without tacking on another amendment to our constitution. U.S. law forbids the government from taking a person’s citizenship against one’s will, but it does permit one to give it up voluntarily. This is a formal written procedure on one’s part through a U.S. Embassy.
It is my understanding, and please correct me if I’m wrong, this is the reason the prosecution for Johnny Taliban Banana is not pressing for the removal of his citizenship. They would lose.