Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada Says Will Not Join Solo U.S. Attack on Iraq Canada toughened its line on the Iraq
OTTAWA (Reuters) ^

Posted on 02/18/2003 4:13:17 PM PST by ruready4eternity

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: albertabound
First, apologies if anyone here has belittled Canada's soldiers -- your folks have hung tough with us in Afghanistan and long before.

To your point about world opinion: I think it's incorrect to assume the US doesn't care about world opinion. To the contrary, I think most of us would love to have world opinion on our side, and the anger you're seeing is our frustration and incomprehension that govts of erstwhile allies seem absolutely determined to oppose us no matter what we say or do. At some point, if we truly believe Hussein is an urgent threat (and we do, post 9/11), and we've tried everything we can to convince the world, in some cases to no avail, we have to make a choice: we either take out the threat, reluctantly without unanimous world opinion; or we live with the threat. The latter is no longer an option -- therefore, we have no choice.
81 posted on 02/18/2003 9:48:52 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
"Canada says will not join solo U.S. attack on Iraq", please read in the final paragraph." "I refuse to play my accordian with the trumpet solo."
82 posted on 02/18/2003 10:10:38 PM PST by unspun (Christ-informed, American constitutional republic: Yes. Libertarian & objectivist revisionisms: No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
tant pis!

Au Canada... la payee dans la toilette!
Au Canada... m. president est un fou.

Au Canada... votre gens sont communiste...

_______________________
On behalf of my family dans Aux Etats-Unis...
(((((((CLOSE THE BORDER!)))))))
83 posted on 02/18/2003 10:34:58 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomworks
Wow, I didn't know Canada had an Army! oh man, what are we gonna do now? We're DOOOMMMEEED!
84 posted on 02/18/2003 10:42:02 PM PST by meanie monster (hooked on phonics werked for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
I totally agree with you about Kuwait. Bush I cleaned up part of the ME. Bush II will complete the job and make the world a safer place for everyone.

Because, THANK THE LORD, the Bush family sees THE BIG PICTURE and they aren't fixated on some myopic "legacy" created out of whole cloth.
85 posted on 02/18/2003 10:42:54 PM PST by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: freedomworks
What a story!

You know, for our entire history we've been treated like that baby brother/sister that didn't have good sense. "Older" countries snicker at our "youth" and our so-called naive ways.

But who's the nation that is poked in the eye by the zealots? Not France, not Germany, no one but the good ol' US of A. We've saved other countries when they needed us, we've developed the most fantastic free market system - that has made us and our trade partners rich, we've poured Billions of dollars in aid to poorer countries.....

And they DARE to turn their backs on us now??? Incredible.
86 posted on 02/18/2003 10:53:56 PM PST by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: ohioWfan

Does this mean we won't have to transport the Canadian troops using US planes and they won't plug into the US AWACS grid when they get to the battlefield?

Ouch.

Absent the few thousand Canadian troops with antiquated equipment I just don't know how we will manage.....

88 posted on 02/18/2003 11:29:57 PM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Does this mean we won't have to transport the Canadian troops using US planes and they won't plug into the US AWACS grid when they get to the battlefield?

Ouch.

Absent the few thousand Canadian troops with antiquated equipment I just don't know how we will manage.....

89 posted on 02/18/2003 11:30:36 PM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
You mean Canada won't join Han Solo and Luke to fight the Empire?
90 posted on 02/18/2003 11:41:21 PM PST by Fledermaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
No body remembers but ,when we left Vietnam, the VC were destroyed and Nixon had stopped the North Vietnamize cold when they tried to take the South. The American Congress, after Nixon was gone, cut off all aid to Vietnam inculding any military assistance. Congress lost the war
91 posted on 02/19/2003 12:56:52 AM PST by bybybill (It`s just for the fish and then the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
Thank you for the email link. I've used it to send this.....

"Please reconsider your stance not to support the overthrow of S. Hussein in conjunction with other states in the Coalition of the Willing. The government is exhibiting extreme short-sightedness and a lack of fortitude bordering on cowardliness."

92 posted on 02/19/2003 5:26:23 AM PST by kanawa (Live right, Die right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ggekko
Don't forget the Mountie........
93 posted on 02/19/2003 5:27:56 AM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President......he bears a heavy burden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
Considering that the UK is joining us, and New Europe will be providing at least technical support, it's not going to be a solo act. Just "gently" remind that senile bat of a PM the Crown is part of this.
94 posted on 02/19/2003 5:28:02 AM PST by steveegg (The Surgeon General has determined that siding with Al-Qaeda is hazardous to your continued rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Those Canadian snipers would be a fine contribution to any action that is undertaken, they are the best in the world by a long shot. Other than that, the Coyote vehicles are top notch, and their Frigates are currently doing well in the middle east patrols, I don't get it. Canada has some decent specializations, I don't buy the argument that they have nothing to contribute. Everyone has something to contribute, the Aussies aren't giving much, but at least they are willing. That frog in charge up there is a disgrace.
95 posted on 02/19/2003 7:27:42 AM PST by GoAhead-Make My Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GoAhead-Make My Day
I got interested in finding out about Canadian snipers and recalled hearing a story about them being offered the bronze star, so I looked it up and got some really good insight into their government's attutude towards war and their squeamishness. It really sounds like they're government are a bunch of hypocrites, especially in the idea that 'Canadians don't kill' check out this link from Snipers paradise (a really cool website BTW):

http://www.snipersparadise.com/articles/2430kill.htm
96 posted on 02/19/2003 7:52:38 AM PST by GoAhead-Make My Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ruready4eternity
The only national political party in Canada which supports regime change in Iraq with or without a second United Nations resolution is the official opposition Canadian Alliance led by Stephen Harper while former leader Stockwell Day is the party's Foreign Affairs critic. We're the only Canadian party willing to shoulder-shoulder against the United Nations Security Council, if necessary, to bring down Saddam Hussein. We're also working to bring about non-violent regime change here in Canada too by defeating the Liberal Party in the next general election. If we accomplish that, Americans can be assured they'll have a strong ally in Canada on foreign policy and an honest negotiator for resolving bilateral issues like the softwood lumber dispute.
97 posted on 02/19/2003 8:26:57 AM PST by Ipberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
heads of state with french surnames need to drink liquid drano.
98 posted on 02/19/2003 8:44:25 AM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson