Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1Old Pro
What we have is two civil wars with a mis-identification of the primary enemy.

First, Islamofascists and regular muslims should be warring, but cannot because every country in which they co-exist is a totalitarian dictatorship of one over the other. Being unable to confront each other directly due to the tanks down the street, Islamofascism confronts the soft underbelly of the West, its secondary enemy.

Second, Western Civilization and its leftist opponents are intellectually warring, but do not break out into physical violence due to the police and the voting booths. This severe disagreement over the legitimacy of Western Civilization is being manifested via the secondary conflict with Islamofascism. The left is just unwilling to defend the security of civilization.

The bulk of people in Islam are not Islamofascists. The bulk of people in Western Civilization are not Utopian Leftists. So, the minority Islamofascists and Utopian Leftists make common cause because they cannot win their own civil wars.

The only common thread between Leftists and Islamofascists is that the destruction of Western Civilization would be useful to their cause. Islamofascists require our destruction in order to bring Allah's rule to the world. Leftist must destroy civilization in order to remake it in Marx's vision. If it weren't for this confluence of interest, they would philosophically hate each other.

Pundits who make nice-nice ignore the essence of the anti-war movement: It seeks to destroy Western Civilization. The punditry assumes that the exercise of freedom in anti-war protest is legitimate, even when its real goal is the destruction of precisely that freedom. We cannot be allowed to look behind the curtain and see the Workers World Party coordinating the protests.

If the anti-war protests were lead by Quakers, attended by blue collar union Democrats, and funded by small businessmen, I would believe in their honesty and legitimacy. But the anti-war crowd is lead by communists, attended by anarchists, and rhetorically supports mass murderers.

I conclude the anti-war movement makes common cause with Islamofascists in order to destroy Western Civilization.
21 posted on 02/18/2003 9:29:19 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Islamofascism sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brad Cloven
This severe disagreement over the legitimacy of Western Civilization is being manifested via the secondary conflict with Islamofascism. The left is just unwilling to defend the security of civilization

Agree. What is happening on the left is a symptom of the fact that Western Civilization as we have known it since circa 1500 is in decay.

59 posted on 02/18/2003 10:48:40 AM PST by colorado tanker (raise the bounty on weasels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson