Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Targets .50 Caliber Revolver for Nationwide Ban
CNSNews.com ^ | February 17, 2003 | Democrat Targets .50 Caliber Revolver for Nationwide Ban By Michael L. Betsch

Posted on 02/18/2003 6:47:07 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last
To: Taxman
Where did you find the stats for the S&W .50 Mag?

The Corbon website. Try the link in # 107.

BTW, the .50 mag 400 grain JSP ammo costs $34.95 + shipping for 20 rounds. Including shipping cost, that's over $2 a round. If I had a gun chambered for this round I wouldn't be shooting it much until .50 mag reloading dies go on the market. Then I still wouldn't be shooting it much because my hands and arms would be terminally sore after the 1st 20 shots.

But seriously, with a little judicious experimentation one could devise some nice mild lead bullet handloads that would make the gun into a pussycat for casual recreational shooting. (otherwise known as plinking) Yeah, I know, you can plink with a .22, but I think it would be kinda fun to make .50 caliber holes in Coke cans.

121 posted on 02/19/2003 6:33:32 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Anyone got a picture of Earl Keller's 45/70 revolver?
122 posted on 02/19/2003 6:37:52 PM PST by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
I found the link, thanks.

That is what I was thinking; big hole in, HUGE hole out!

But you are right -- reloading will be the only way this poor man can afford to shoot that puppy.

But not in a pistol. I'll wait 'til Marlin produces a lever action carbine chambered for that bad boy!

With a detachable 10 round box magazine? LOL!
123 posted on 02/19/2003 7:14:39 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: archy
I look forward to your progress reports and finished product.
124 posted on 02/19/2003 7:35:00 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Davis believes the 500 Magnum has a greater potential for becoming a lethal inner-city status symbol than an effective hunting tool, at least in his congressional district. He added that its high power combined with its concealability could make it the "weapon of choice" for urban gangs.

"If you live in a place like Chicago, and you know the amount of violence that is perpetrated by individuals who grow-up with the idea that having, handling and using a gun is a way-of-life in terms of establishing yourself on the streets or as part of the culture, then I'm afraid that many of these individuals will, in fact, acquire this weapon," Davis said.

God forbid that these law abiding gang members should ever go to jail. Such notions have no place in the Democrat Party.

Of course, the solution with them is always the same. Law abiding citizens must be stripped of their rights, because after all, passing a law is the only way to get criminals to obey them.

Currie compared the 500 Magnum to "military-style assault weapons," although she had no information to base her claims on except for a "tip" received from a reporter.

"I'm not a weapons expert, but it sounded like pretty strong firepower to me," Currie said.

You're not a expert on the Constitution either, are you? Call it a wild guess on my part.

125 posted on 02/19/2003 9:26:06 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
But Davis said the .50 caliber revolver, which weighs 72.5 ounces and has an overall length 15-inch has no purpose in society except to cause injury and death to humans, dismissing the manufacturer's claim that it is intended for hunting wild game.

He claimed handguns in general are specifically designed kill fellow human beings, whereas rifles and shotguns are typically relegated to hunting animals.

.........and besides all of that, there is no shortage of animals that walk on two legs, unfortunately. Some actually even become heads of state. Like Saddam, Kim Jong, et al.

Interestingly enough, they share your viewpoint, Mr Davis, to a great degree. They see an armed populace as a liability, while a leader with good intentions sees them as an asset.

126 posted on 02/19/2003 9:39:28 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Marxist gungrabbers all suffer from severe lead deficiencies.

FMCDH-Bullets First.

127 posted on 02/19/2003 10:03:04 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I own a S&W 50 cal. It is NOT a handgun that can be concealed easily or rapidly fired. When you shoot the gun you have to reaim and regain your composer. It weighs 4 1/2lbs,so it cannot be held up for long periods of time. You sure can't one hand as is the style for gang bangers. It only has TWO uses 1. Target shooting for the control enviroment. 2. For hunting where you use a rest of some kind. It would be suicide for a thug to carry or try to use this handgun for gang related actvities.
128 posted on 12/18/2003 4:05:20 AM PST by Thharleyrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Hey, nobody wants to take away our guns. You gun nuts are just being alarmist.

You can have any gun you want, as long as it's not too big, too small, too inexpesive, too accurate, too inaccurate, holds too many rounds, holds the wrong type of rounds, can be modified to hold too many rounds or fire the wrong type of rounds, looks scary, "might be dangerous", or that could be misused by a criminal, an idiot, or a mental patient.

What are you people complaining about?

129 posted on 12/18/2003 4:34:06 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
This one missed the bang_list somehow.
130 posted on 12/18/2003 5:10:40 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
When you put it that way, I don't know what I was thinking.
131 posted on 12/18/2003 5:45:11 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
When you put it that way, I don't know what I was thinking.

The sad thing is that everything in that statement represents an actual argument used at one time or another by the gun grabbers. Pretty pathetic when hyperbole maps perfectly to reality.

132 posted on 12/18/2003 12:03:07 PM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
I thought it was a copper and tungstun deficiency
133 posted on 12/18/2003 4:05:39 PM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: archy
Your over under sounds like a modern double express rifle for a dangerous game stopper, sort of. And two at a time is probably a sufficient rate of fire for this bad boy.


134 posted on 12/18/2003 5:16:49 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
A well-known gun maker recently introduced a powerful new hunting revolver that is said to have no equal in terms of firepower.

It's still just a pistol. You won't have to go terribly far into rifle calibers to find equals for it...

135 posted on 12/18/2003 5:19:29 PM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.)

Wasn't Danny Davis a ref in the WWF?

136 posted on 12/18/2003 5:21:56 PM PST by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
He claimed handguns in general are specifically designed kill fellow human beings, whereas rifles and shotguns are typically relegated to hunting animals.

Somebody needs to tell the Marines about that, but I think I'll let *him* do it, while I watch. :)

"You don't go out hunting deer with a revolver," Davis said."

You do if it's a .50 caliber with 3 times the muzzle energy of a .44 magnum. Even a .44 magnum could be use.

"Those of us who live in big, urban centers have a different fear and a different take than some people who may live in different environments."

But he would saddle everyone with laws that wouldn't really even do the folks in the urban jungle any good. Why not call for a CHL law, which might actually help the people living there. Probably doesn't trust his constituents that much, I guess. Rather keep 'em on the plantation I guess.

137 posted on 12/18/2003 5:51:10 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Magnum Research makes the same revolver this idiot is trying to ban in .45 Long Colt/.410. Its not 12 gauge, but its a start.

They make it .45/70. Guy running the indoor range pulled one out, and fired it on the range, last time I was at that particular range, nearly a year ago now I think. (It' 350 miles away, I use a different range nearby). The video clip on the MR site doesn't do it justice. :)

138 posted on 12/18/2003 5:58:24 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Concealability ?
In what ? A '62 Buick ?

In a '62 Buick, you can conceal a 20mm Vulcan Gatling cannon, but I think you have to add a higher voltage generator to power the thing. The A-10's 30 mm Avenger won't quite fit. More's the pity. :)

139 posted on 12/18/2003 6:02:55 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
If memory serves me $2 box cutters were ultimately responsible for more than 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001. Why don't we have a ban on them?

Call me simple, but why not just make it a crime to use a weapon of any kind to maim or kill others? Then you wouldn't need all these extra feel-good laws that merely make criminals out of unknowing, unsuspecting, innocents...

Oh... that's right... it IS illegal already. Then why pass feel-good laws that do nothing but harass people who...

Oh... that's right... that's what they want.

140 posted on 12/18/2003 6:03:31 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson