Skip to comments.
N Korea threatens truce breach
bbc ^
| 2/17/03
Posted on 02/17/2003 2:31:22 PM PST by knak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Dog
Then he just might see those nukes he's been dreaming of after all....
To: knak
I have never seen such conspicuous and desperate pleas for attention (and money).
22
posted on
02/17/2003 2:49:39 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: knak
Earlier on Monday, the United States and South Korea announced they would stage joint military exercises in South Korea next month, in a move which was thought likely to heighten tensions with the North. For those of you who don't know, this is something the US and South Korea have done every year for the last 30 years, at least.
The shrill, bellicose statements of the North are what heighten tensions.
23
posted on
02/17/2003 2:52:10 PM PST
by
jimt
To: knak
Has anybody told Kim Jong Il what a repulsive depraved putrid little buffoon George Bush thinks he is? Or what a sick joke his tiny little tyranny is?
To: knak
Did they provide any actual evidence of the US violating the agreement ?
To: knak
North Korean Cry-baby BUMP!
26
posted on
02/17/2003 2:55:43 PM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: sackofcatfood
Does anyone doubt that NK is doing anything other than *trying* to get invaded by the US? Why?
Their economy isn't good, they don't have any food, people are starving, and people are getting tired of the communist dictatorship. Sort of like the Soviet Union just before it fell apart.
Kim Jung Il needs an enemy to unite his people and to blame all the problems on. If it's OUR fault, it's not HIS fault. If the country is in danger, perhaps the people won't try to revolt.
27
posted on
02/17/2003 3:01:57 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: Mr. Mojo
They're starving. Perhaps they've run out of food for the military.
28
posted on
02/17/2003 3:02:25 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
To: sackofcatfood
They are trying to extort some financial concessions from the US or S. Korea and they think now is the time to do it, while we are tied up with Iraq.
29
posted on
02/17/2003 3:03:04 PM PST
by
Ranger
To: Ranger
Perhaps China is trying to distract us into beefing up defenses in NK so we won't be able to respond to a taiwan invasion.
just a thought.
To: knak
Man, how bad do they want an asskicking anyway?
What a temper tantrum.
To: All
more from reuters:
N.Korea threatens to scrap armistice
SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea's army is threatening to abandon its commitment to the 1953 Korean War armistice if sanctions such as a naval blockade are imposed on the isolated communist state over its nuclear crisis.
"The KPA (Korean People's Army) side will be left with no option but to take a decisive step to abandon its commitment to implement the Armistice Agreement as a signatory to it and free itself from the binding force of all its provisions, regarding the possible sanctions to be taken by the U.S. side against the DPRK (North Korea)," said the North's army in a statement on Tuesday.
The statement said the United States was planning to bolster its military forces around the peninsula and to "conduct naval blockade operations which can be seen only between the warring states during the war and this is little short of an open declaration of war in the long-run".
"If the U.S. side continues violating and misusing the Armistice Agreement as it pleases, there will be no need for the DPRK to remain bound to the AA uncomfortably," said the statement published by the North's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).
In the early 1990s, Pyongyang announced that it would not adhere to the pact, signed in 1953 by China and North Korea on the communist side and by the U.S.-led United Nations Command on the side of the international community.
32
posted on
02/17/2003 3:08:41 PM PST
by
knak
To: sackofcatfood
This could be inspired by China, or it could be North Korea just realizing that they are next after Iraq, and deciding that they want to try to make some kind of deal with us before we have wiped Iraq out and they have a weaker bargaining position. I hope it's the latter, as I don't want to have to take on China at this stage. I don't think China wants to take us on, either, as they are enjoying the economic fruits of our relationship, but I don't think they have given up on overtaking the US, and they probably don't mind using others to explore American limits.
33
posted on
02/17/2003 3:08:51 PM PST
by
Defiant
To: knak
Thank you so much for this history, knak. Fully appreciated.
We need statemen. We have politicos.
Sigh
34
posted on
02/17/2003 3:16:58 PM PST
by
Spirited
To: knak
What's next? Did N Kor sign the Magna Carta? They'll want to withdraw from that if this doesn't work.
To: sackofcatfood
Bede, bede, bede, you got um, Buck.
This is a Chinese operation designed to stop us from going to Iraq. High stakes poker, and the NKs better back down because Bush will retaliate hard if NK strikes, and we could easily have High Noon at the SLBM Corral.
Not that I would mind, but I hate to have millions, including thousands of US troops and civilians, die unnecessarily in the process.
China would go out in one big blaze.
To: knak
Kim Jong Il is definitely ILL!!!! He's opened his mouth too many times and knows he is now next on the list.....Tick....Tick....Tick....Tick....Tick....Tick....Tick....and the clock counts down on him as well!!!!
37
posted on
02/17/2003 4:35:44 PM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: sackofcatfood
I think China's involved, too. It looks as if this whole charade involving North Korea has been undertaken so the Chinese can declare war on Taiwan while we're busy in Iraq.
When it gets closer to war, look for the North Koreans to do something drastic. That will be a sure sign that the Chinese are about to stage an attack.
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson