[captain11]

DNA is not a 'program' and you cannot prove it is without assuming a 'programmer'. Same Begged Question we started with.

Guess again. And again. At root, that's precisely what DNA encodes...a program. A stunningly complex program that controls how a fairly undifferentiated handful of cells grows into a manta ray, or a zebra, or a human.

How that program came to be is obvious to some of us, but Southack doesn't need to prove there is a programmer. A program it is.

[Southack]

"Guess again. And again. At root, that's precisely what DNA encodes...a program. A stunningly complex program that controls how a fairly undifferentiated handful of cells grows into a manta ray, or a zebra, or a human.

How that program came to be is obvious to some of us, but Southack doesn't need to prove there is a programmer. A program it is."

Thanks. I'm always amazed when the Evolutionists start denying basic proven, scientifically accepted facts.

Of course DNA is a program. Why must Darwinists deny that fact?

Nice links above, by the way.