Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LogicWings
DNA is not a 'program' and you cannot prove it is without assuming a 'programmer'. Same Begged Question we started with.

Guess again. And again. At root, that's precisely what DNA encodes...a program. A stunningly complex program that controls how a fairly undifferentiated handful of cells grows into a manta ray, or a zebra, or a human.

How that program came to be is obvious to some of us, but Southack doesn't need to prove there is a programmer. A program it is.

174 posted on 02/16/2003 2:16:24 AM PST by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: captain11
"Guess again. And again. At root, that's precisely what DNA encodes...a program. A stunningly complex program that controls how a fairly undifferentiated handful of cells grows into a manta ray, or a zebra, or a human.

How that program came to be is obvious to some of us, but Southack doesn't need to prove there is a programmer. A program it is."

Thanks. I'm always amazed when the Evolutionists start denying basic proven, scientifically accepted facts.

Of course DNA is a program. Why must Darwinists deny that fact?

Nice links above, by the way.

215 posted on 02/16/2003 11:33:02 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson