That would depend on size. There's more gas than bacteria in the universe.
A uniform mix of simple gas molecules is very "complex" and thus has a lot of information-theory "information." It does, that is, if you're trying to specify the exact, exact, exact, exact state of the gas at a given moment. But there's no point in doing that, because in another tenth of a second the gas will be in an utterly different exact, exact, exact, exact state. (That is, every one of its molecules will have moved and banged into a neighbor hundreds of times over the interval.) For almost any real purpose under the sun, the gas can be completely described with some information about temperature, pressure, maybe chemical composition ... a statistical summary.
By comparison, your bacterium is "simple." It has lots of liquids, in which molecules are not so free to move as in a gas, and solids, which are even more predictable. It would be far harder to statistically summarize the bacterium, but that's not the point of the really technical definitions of information you see in some disciplines.
That's why it is necessary to get your terms straight, and why people like Dembski can dazzle willing creationists with BS. Certain kinds of "information" and "order" can't go up in the universe, but what most people think of as "order," "information," and "complexity" have done nothing but go up.