[secretagent]

Good point. Bush's Ashcroft seems clearly better on the Second Amendment than we'd get with a Gore nominee.

As to socialist agenda, I just translate that to government social programs and domestic spending proposals. The two parties seem about the same, with some differences.

For example, the Dems want to keep social security as it is, with the Reps hinting at reform. Bush, on the other hand, took the lead in expanding the role of the Feds in education.

I miss the bold talk of 94 - "Abolish the NEA".

[go star go]

As to socialist agenda, I just translate that to government social programs and domestic spending proposals. The two parties seem about the same, with some differences.

That the dumbets thing I've ever seen posted!

[go star go]

I miss the bold talk of 94 - "Abolish the NEA".

I'm sure you do. There's noone for your Demonrat friends to demonize like Newt today huh...

[sneakypete]

Bush's Ashcroft seems clearly better on the Second Amendment than we'd get with a Gore nominee.

The "No-Justice Dept" under Janet Ashcroft has a OFFICIAL WRITTEN POSITION that "although the 2nd Amendment guarantees the individual the right to own guns,the federal government still reserves the right to place reasonable restrictions on that right". In other words,"I did NOT have sex with that woman,Monica Lewinsky". If they can regulate it,with "reasonable restrictions" and THEY are the ones who gets to define what "reasonable" is,the individual right is null and void.