Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: secretagent
Bush's Ashcroft seems clearly better on the Second Amendment than we'd get with a Gore nominee.

The "No-Justice Dept" under Janet Ashcroft has a OFFICIAL WRITTEN POSITION that "although the 2nd Amendment guarantees the individual the right to own guns,the federal government still reserves the right to place reasonable restrictions on that right". In other words,"I did NOT have sex with that woman,Monica Lewinsky". If they can regulate it,with "reasonable restrictions" and THEY are the ones who gets to define what "reasonable" is,the individual right is null and void.

103 posted on 02/15/2003 6:40:58 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: sneakypete
Dittos to your concern that the feds might destroy the 2nd Amendment via "reasonable regulation" and thanks for the Justice Department quote:

"although the 2nd Amendment guarantees the individual the right to own guns,the federal government still reserves the right to place reasonable restrictions on that right".

I prefer to hope for this as a bright spot in the Bush administration, since the JD supports, at least rhetorically, the individual right to keep and bear arms.

(I see reasonable regulation as including the possession of nuclear weapons and other WMD - drawing the bright margin line, well...)

In specific defense of Ashcroft - I think he defended not keeping a national database of gun owners.

115 posted on 02/15/2003 9:07:12 AM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson