Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Jones
I think that he's a communist instead. The younger bush is also a communist.

Nah,they are actually both "One-Worlder Fascists".They see the ideal system is one that is ran like a corporation,so they want to see America no longer be a sovereign nation. The Bush family see themselves in the role of the ruling class,and that's why Ali Bubba refuses to close the borders or crack down on illegal aliens. There is another Jorge Bush waiting in the background to run for president,Jeb's half-Mexican son. The Bush family needs and wants those Mexican votes in order to insure he gets elected. Once he does,look for the move to be made to unite Mexico,Canada,and the US into one nation/economic block. When you create a new nation,you need a new Constitution.

104 posted on 02/15/2003 6:57:57 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: sneakypete
well, I do agree with you that obviously the Bush's are very big for the New World Order, they even say so. And the NWO is just as you said. I was only saying that if you look at what the elder bush did to the economy when he was pres the only way you can make sense of it is that he seems to have wanted to do bad to the economy. Maybe that's part of the NWO plan to humble america. The younger bush seems to be doing the same IMO. His massive spending growth on bureaucracy in washington while imposing draconian cuts in medicaire doesn't make sense. I don't trust the Bush'. They're anti-american in their behavior.

The way we're trading with CHina is suicidal for our nation. I was watching recently on cspan. They had a panel of people speaking about the massive trade deficit. One economist was saying exactly what I've been saying here. That it is shocking and unbelievable and incredible that the chinese currency does not float. She said it is allowed to float within a range, but is not really free, that it is pegged very much artificially low. And we're trading with them on this scale. This amounts to actual sabotage of the american economy. Bush 1 started these trade terms. Clinton continued them. Bush 2 is also continuing them. But in the meantime we have this 5% of gdp trade deficit financed by borrowing. We're being set up for disaster it seems or our leaders are the stupidest people in the world.

THe old paradigm of conflict between liberals and conservatives or between democrats and republicans is completely outdated and suicidal for our people to engage in today. The new paradigm is anti new world order or pro-new world order. The politicians of both parties are compromised, our media is compromised. Our people are in the dark and playing right into their hands with these petty rivalries between the dems and the repubs.

Our only chance is to vote out incumbents in congress, all of them, who support NWO policies. NWO policies include the refusal to stop illegal immigration, h1b, the stupid trade policies, the rural cleansing which bush has not reversed effectively and regulations to stop american industry from thriving in america. We re-elect 98% of our politicians when they run for re-election. We let the news media decide who we don't re-elect even. The people are completely out of the loop. So, it is just as if a communist cabal has taken over and rendered our democracy a useful idiot tool for them. But it is New World Order instead. If we re-elected 30% of our congressmen instead of 98%, then we'd have a chance.
113 posted on 02/15/2003 8:31:24 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: sneakypete
Once he does,look for the move to be made to unite Mexico,Canada,and the US into one nation/economic block. When you create a new nation,you need a new Constitution.

NAFTA was the prelude to this, and the next stage (FTAA) is in the works. Once the regions are united economically, a political union will follow, just like in Europe. I think it will happen before George P runs since it will be 20+ years before he runs. I believe it will happen within a decade unless the course is changed.

And the new Constitution will NOT recognize individual Rights. Sure, it will pay lip service to them, and may even list a few, but in the following form: "The Right of the People to X,Y, Z, shall not be infrigned unless the gov't passes a law to infringe upon it." In other words, completely meaningless.

And the sad thing is that many people here will be lapping it up as long as the polticians proposing it have an "R" after their name.

122 posted on 02/15/2003 8:18:45 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson