Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH'S ACHILLES' HEEL
National Review Online ^ | February 11, 2003 | By Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 02/14/2003 10:01:53 PM PST by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last
To: Red Jones
He actually said that he was going to make sure that government didn't grow faster than the economy, that he was going to hold it down to 4% because they just had a report that the gdp grew by 4%. Sure, it grew by 4% in one quarter. But in the other quarters since he became president it grew by 1-2%, and he grew the government tby 8% or more. And it is unlikely the 4% figure will hold, but he latches onto it and vows this discipline. He's just like Clinton.

Cut the guy some slack.

Do you really believe he can figure out what 4% a number is?

121 posted on 02/15/2003 8:11:57 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Once he does,look for the move to be made to unite Mexico,Canada,and the US into one nation/economic block. When you create a new nation,you need a new Constitution.

NAFTA was the prelude to this, and the next stage (FTAA) is in the works. Once the regions are united economically, a political union will follow, just like in Europe. I think it will happen before George P runs since it will be 20+ years before he runs. I believe it will happen within a decade unless the course is changed.

And the new Constitution will NOT recognize individual Rights. Sure, it will pay lip service to them, and may even list a few, but in the following form: "The Right of the People to X,Y, Z, shall not be infrigned unless the gov't passes a law to infringe upon it." In other words, completely meaningless.

And the sad thing is that many people here will be lapping it up as long as the polticians proposing it have an "R" after their name.

122 posted on 02/15/2003 8:18:45 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Thanks!
123 posted on 02/15/2003 9:17:29 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
And the sad thing is that many people here will be lapping it up as long as the polticians proposing it have an "R" after their name.

Yup,I coined a term for what is happening,"Corporate Communism". Instead of a Politiboro,we will have a board of directors What it really amounts to is a return to the feudal system. Think "Whole country=company town",and you won't be far off the mark. This was inevitable once corporations all became multi-nationals. They are no longer "American Corporations" or "German Corporations". They are "Corporate citizens of th world",and it is only natural for them to want only one set on import/export laws,tax laws,environmental laws,worker safety laws,etc,etc,etc. Especially when THEY will be the ones doing the writing.

124 posted on 02/16/2003 4:12:58 PM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson