Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review Online ^ | February 11, 2003 | By Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 02/14/2003 10:01:53 PM PST by Uncle Bill

Bush’s Achilles’ Heel

Government Spending Is Out Of Control.

National Review Online
By Veronique de Rugy
February 11, 2003

Is there much to celebrate in George W. Bush's proposed 2004 budget? To be sure, the president is proposing meaningful tax reform that will make America more competitive and move us closer to a simple and fair flat tax. Yet before we rush to give the administration an "A," let's open up the budget and take a look at some of the gory details.

Sadly, a cursory inspection reveals that the president is engaged in an overspending frenzy that continues to reward programs that should be abolished. The White House argues that "we need spending discipline" but turns right around and boosts domestic spending by "only" 4% next year. Of course, this assumes that Congress will resist the bipartisan temptation to spend our money on pork-barrel projects. And it also assumes that the president will veto a bill that spends too much money — something he has not done since taking office.

Government spending is President Bush's Achilles' heel. In his first two years in office, he signed a bloated education bill and a subsidy-laden farm bill. Also, numbers show that in the first three years this administration will have increased government spending by 13.5%, making this administration more profligate than the Clinton administration.

The president's defenders argue that everything must take a back seat to the war on terror, implying that increased spending is mainly the result of defense outlays. Yet the data show that spending has increased in all areas.

According to Chris Edwards at the Cato Institute, over the first three years of Bush budgeting, non-defense discretionary outlays will rise 18% — a number that far exceeds the spending increases during the first three years of the last six administrations. And it pales in comparison to the Ronald Reagan budgets. President Reagan restored America's military during his two terms, boosting defense outlays by 19.2% in the first term and 10.4% in the second. But Reagan also reduced non-defense outlays, cutting domestic spending by 13.5% in the first term and 3.2% in the second. That is real budget discipline.

President Bush is also spending more than Bill Clinton. Clinton actually reduced non-defense outlays in his first term, albeit by only 0.7%. And, for all his flaws, he still signed market-oriented reforms such as NAFTA, farm deregulation, telecommunications deregulation, and financial-services deregulation.

The overall numbers show spending is growing too fast. But the details of the president's budget are even more discouraging. Only the Justice and the Labor Departments — 2 of 21 major department agencies — will see their budgets reduced. Taxpayers also are being burdened with new programs, including the $15 billion Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and $450 million to bring mentors to disadvantaged students and to the children of prisoners. Are these really legitimate functions of the federal government? What happened to the Constitution?

And let's not forget corporate welfare. Bush's proposal to give $1.7 billion over the next 5 years — more than $50 per American — to the automobile industry through the Freedom Fuel and FreedomCAR programs for hydrogen-fuel-cell research and development illustrates this spending frenzy. Those programs are extensions of the $1.5 billion failed Partnership for the New Generation of Vehicles program, under the Clinton administration. After eight years of subsidies, it is time to say no.

To be fair, President Bush probably would prefer less spending, but he does not want to be attacked for being "mean-spirited." But special-interest lobbyists see this as a sign of weakness and act accordingly. After all, Washington is the only place in the world where spending increases are classified as spending cuts merely because the increase was smaller than the big spenders wanted.

We also know that President Bush is committed to reforming Social Security. But Social Security reform was nowhere to be found in this budget. Maybe the administration is waiting for the second term to move forward with the much-needed private accounts. At this rate, though, there might not be a second term. So would it not be wiser to expend some political capital promoting Social Security reforms that would give the economy a tremendous boost?

At the end of the day, over-spending matters because big government hurts our economy's performance. Fiscal responsibility means more than just lower taxes. It also means having the courage to say no to wasteful spending — even if that means Ted Kennedy will get upset.

President Bush's tax agenda is great news for the American people. His stated commitment to Social Security reform would be good for workers and retirees. But so far it is only talk and no action. To maximize the economic benefits of these policies, the president needs to put big government on a diet.

Veronique de Rugy is a fiscal policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Who stated the following:

"Government ought to have a policy that helps people with a downpayment."

A. - OR - B.


You are not hallucinating, he really wants to have the government provide downpayments.


Bush Signs Largest Family Planning Bill In U.S. History
"On Thursday, January 10, 2002, the White House reported President Bush signed the ominous $15.4 billion foreign appropriations bill, H.R. 2506, for fiscal-year 2002. The bill authorizes $446.5 million U.S. tax dollars to be given to other countries for abortion-family planning activities throughout the world. The abortion-family planning funds approved by Bush represents an increase of $21.5 million over last year for international family planning."

AND THESE ARE REPUBLICANS - "Despite the fact that the Republicans control the White House, the House of Representatives, and 30 governorships, the nation is now in the midst of the biggest government spending spree since LBJ. Incredibly, the domestic social welfare budget has expanded more in just two years ($96 billion) under George W. Bush than in Bill Clinton's first six years in office ($51 billion)."

The Return of Big Government - Federal spending is skyrocketing, but shockingly little of it is related to Sept. 11. - Fortune

Bush Spending Bill Largest Ever

Washington's $782 Billion Spending Spree

Bush Calls For $400 Billion In Medicare Spending

Meanwhile, Back On The Farm

Bush Urges Congress to Deliver on Prescription Drugs for Medicare

Bush Asks for $15 Billion to Fight AIDS in Africa

Bush Seeks Nearly $60 Billion In New IT Spending

Bush Seeks 50 Percent Foreign Aid Boost

Bush Releases $200M in Heating Aid

Congress OKs spending bill (including $90k for cowgirl museum bilingual audio tour)

"President Bush yesterday said Americans are duty-bound to 'share our wealth' with poor nations and promised a 50 percent increase in foreign aid"

Bush Plans New Agency to Dole Out Billions in Aid

Washington's Dead Donkeys (Out Of Control Spending And Lies By Republicans)

Bush 2004 Budget Plan Tops $2 Trillion

Bush Likely to Project Record Budget Deficits


Phony Faith-Based Initiative

Bush's Dirty Little Budget Secret - "If you think President Bush's tax cuts will save you money, guess again, .. because the long-term spending increases in his new budget outnumber tax cuts by a ratio of 10 to 1. Showing gratitude for Bush's tax cuts is like thanking a pickpocket for returning $10 of the $100 he just stole,"

One example:

"This farm bill will cost the average American taxpaying family $4,300 in higher taxes."

"Not over my dead body will they raise your taxes,"
George W. Bush - SOURCE.


President George W. Bush - Biography


"George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. Formerly the 46th Governor of the State of Texas, President Bush has earned a reputation as a compassionate conservative who shapes policy based on the principles of limited government,..."

A Government Limited To What?


"The surest way to bust this economy is to increase the role and the size of the federal government."
George W. Bush - Source: Presidential debate, Boston, MA. - Oct 3, 2000.



For the children:

How Big Is The Government Debt? - $33.1 TRILLION

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bush; socialism; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2003 10:01:53 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
More green eye-shade bullshit from Uncle Bill.

The greatest economy in the 20th century had massive deficits, under Ronald Reagan.

Take a chill pill and encourage the tax cuts.

2 posted on 02/14/2003 10:05:01 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Take a chill pill

It goes down easier with Kool-aid.

3 posted on 02/14/2003 10:10:49 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
While I am concerned over the amount of MY money being spent by the Executive branch, I take solace in the fact that the President is not shoving cigars up an intern’s bottom while He does so.
4 posted on 02/14/2003 10:12:43 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Oh pish...
5 posted on 02/14/2003 10:17:29 PM PST by Tamzee (There are 10 types of people... those who read binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
.."IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Armed Services Committee..
6 posted on 02/14/2003 10:22:05 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ( ..Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
You did read what you posted right?

The total debt, personal and public was the figure you posted, not just "government".
7 posted on 02/14/2003 10:56:09 PM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I see Uncle Schill is at it again, Everytime he post here DU stands up and cheers
8 posted on 02/14/2003 11:11:51 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
This may be the alltime linking extravaganza.

We salute our hobby free shut-ins!

9 posted on 02/14/2003 11:15:31 PM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
LOL, I don't know if I would call it "linking", I would call it "DNC Spamming" wrapped in useless Libertarian spew
10 posted on 02/14/2003 11:22:01 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
The great thing about you is that you are an evangelist for the "Less is More" success program.

I hit the second link ... Lindbergh's baby is kidnapped?

11 posted on 02/14/2003 11:24:30 PM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Dude, like, the red is just a little too much, man.

It really messes with the eyes.

Um, could you, like, turn it back to black?


12 posted on 02/14/2003 11:26:53 PM PST by Experiment 6-2-6 (Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Big change when the DNC sounds more fiscally conservative than the RNC.
13 posted on 02/14/2003 11:28:24 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
We are reaching out...
14 posted on 02/14/2003 11:33:32 PM PST by chnsmok (Hi fellow WA stater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
You are the Weakest Link. Goodbye.
15 posted on 02/14/2003 11:33:41 PM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
You keep believing that, When I hear a so called so-called conservative claiming the DNC sounds more "Fiscally Conservative" than the RNC I think of the bafoons who said the same thing about Reagan when he was spending like a drunken sailor. There is a difference between spending on the promotion of excellence and spending on failed policies.
16 posted on 02/14/2003 11:38:31 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I'm with you Uncle Bill. We should have elected Al Gore.
17 posted on 02/14/2003 11:39:43 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Hey, But don't pay any attention to me or the others, You Libertarians have always served as usefull idiots, The .02% of the vote you represent has no effect whatsoever, So have at it
18 posted on 02/14/2003 11:41:17 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: go star go
19 posted on 02/14/2003 11:41:43 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Have you ever noticed how many certifiable idiots there are among us...
20 posted on 02/14/2003 11:46:12 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson