[Howlin]

Surely, even you must recognize that the WHITE HOUSE is able to release the memoranda without any ethics breach.

Seven LIVING present and former solicitor generals say they can't.

Of course, what did the rule of law every mean to you.

[PhiKapMom]

RATs must be worried, they sent their stooge here with their lies.

Those working papers cannot be turned over no more than working papers of a lawyer working on a case are subject to be turned over in a trial. But then when did the Law ever matter to the RATs?

My question of the day -- Did Hillary get her moles inside the Justice Department to give her these papers that are not to be released according to seven solicitors of both parties? If we could only prove she has those papers, she would be history!

[MurryMom]

Seven LIVING present and former solicitor generals say they can't.

IOW, only Democrats are interested in learning the truth about what Estrada wrote. BTW, the 7 SG's didn't say they CAN'T release the old memos, because they understand there is no ethical or legal prohibition against the WHITE HOUSE releasing them. Those old memos are the property of the WH, not Estrada.

Of course, what did the rule of law every mean to you.

You can't even identify any rule of law applicable here, let alone explain how the rule applies to Estrada's soon-to-fail nomination.