Skip to comments.
Landrieu disavows Estrada ads
Washington Times ^
| 2/13/03
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 02/12/2003 10:58:03 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, who is now opposing the nomination of Miguel Estrada to a federal appeals court judgeship, ran Spanish-language radio ads during her campaign for a December runoff election saying she supported his nomination.
The ads, which ran on a New Orleans radio station for almost two weeks, praised Mrs. Landrieu's outreach to Hispanics and specifically noted Mr. Estrada.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/12/2003 10:58:03 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
She is a Rat,Whats new?
2
posted on
02/12/2003 11:00:53 PM PST
by
noutopia
To: kattracks
I hated watching the two candidates run for the Louisiana seat in December. It was all about two very medoicre persons, neither of which had or has any potential to be anyone who will be taken seriously about anything. Sad really. It was one of the poorest choices out there frankly.
3
posted on
02/12/2003 11:01:45 PM PST
by
Torie
To: kattracks
"She lied to the community, and now she's turning back on the community that helped elect her," said Sharon Castillo, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee. "I sure hope that the voters are going to hold her accountable."
She also said it was "another example of Democrats saying anything to get elected."
4
posted on
02/12/2003 11:02:19 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: kattracks
"I take personal responsibility for the error and I apologize to anyone who was misled by these ads."The usual empty words from an empty pantsuit. Taking real responsibility would involve actually doing something other than mouthing insincere apologies. At the least, this demonstrates her incompetence at not knowing what her campaign was doing. At most, it demonstrates the sort of venality and contempt for morality at which Democrats excel.
To: kattracks
Oh no! A demonrat lied??? Next thing you know, the sun will be rising in the east and water will be wet.
To: kattracks
Semantics. She still took advantage of the misunderstanding to get votes and didn't correct it until today.
7
posted on
02/12/2003 11:12:48 PM PST
by
swheats
To: kattracks
Landrieu is every bit as duplicitious as Hillary. She just flies below radar. No matter what she says in the "Ivory Tower" confines of Capitol Hill it ain't going to wash with the folks in her home state. The following excerpt is from a Louisiana Republican Party email:
"This is a slap in the face of the Hispanic community. We feel betrayed by Mary Landrieu's actions. Besides a despicable show of partisanship, Senator Landrieu is disregarding the judicial crisis our country is facing," proclaimed Oscar Avila, an activist in the New Orleans area Hispanic community.
While U.S. Senator John Breaux (D-LA) and an overwhelming number of Hispanic organizations are supporting the confirmation of Miguel Estrada, Senator Landrieu has said "she is withholding a decision on the nomination until she can check further into his background to determine whether he is 'truly in the mainstream' of judicial opinion, as his supporters maintain."' (Bruce Alpert, "Bush nominee, Landrieu meet; Senator still unsure he is mainstream" The Times-Picayune, February 7, 2003)
Sen. Breaux further expressed outrage at Landrieu and Senate Democrats by saying; 'Look, the country is on Orange Alert. We're telling people to stockpile water, duct tape and plastic to secure their safe rooms; we have a war within the next couple of weeks possibly in Iraq; who knows what is going to happen with North Korea; and consumer confidence is at an all-time low,' " Breaux said. "Now is not the time to be tying up the Senate on a nominee who is given the very highest recommendations by the American Bar Association." (Bruce Alpert, "Landrieu joins effort to block judicial vote" The Times-Picayune, February 11,2003)
In the final days before the November elections, Landrieu's campaign ran a radio ad stating that "Mary Landrieu has worked close to the Hispanic community. Mary Landrieu also supported the candidacy of Honduran Miguel Estrada for the Federal Court of Appeals." (Campaign Ad, KGLA 1540 AM, Friends of Mary Landrieu)
"Miguel Estrada deserves a vote on the Senate floor. Mary Landrieu and all those trying to delay or obstruct a vote should and will be held accountable by the Hispanic community who entrusted them," said Dr. Vinicio Madrigal, Chairman of the Louisiana Hispanic Republican Coalition.
8
posted on
02/12/2003 11:22:54 PM PST
by
Darlin'
(The choice is clear, you stand with us or you stand with terrorist)
To: swheats
It was no misunderstanding.
9
posted on
02/12/2003 11:25:45 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
To: Howlin
I know, that's what makes it so freakin upsetting. These people use and abuse. They are so eve ill.
10
posted on
02/12/2003 11:27:08 PM PST
by
swheats
To: Darlin'
Disgusting. I swear, I never thought I'd see such duplicity in my lifetime. Lie after lie after lie.
11
posted on
02/12/2003 11:27:36 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
To: Howlin
Isn't it amazing the live thread is the only one that takes lightyears to post?
12
posted on
02/12/2003 11:28:11 PM PST
by
swheats
To: swheats
Call a spade a spade...call a Dim a Dim...she LIED!
To: swheats
Yes, I wonder what the deal on that is?
14
posted on
02/12/2003 11:28:51 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
She is Lying! She will Lie! She is a Dim!
To: Howlin
You think we would probably go to be or something until it was fixed. But noooooo, we have to freep until the lights go off or should I say John pulling the plug. LOL
16
posted on
02/12/2003 11:30:32 PM PST
by
swheats
To: Howlin
It is disgusting and disheartening. They lie and their base just ignores it. What worse, the press provides cover for them. It makes me sick.
17
posted on
02/12/2003 11:32:23 PM PST
by
Darlin'
(The choice is clear, you stand with us or you stand with terrorist)
To: Howlin; swheats
I wonder about that, too. We spent so much time just waiting to see what had been said. The "New posts to you" feature is still messed up.
18
posted on
02/12/2003 11:34:28 PM PST
by
Darlin'
(The choice is clear, you stand with us or you stand with terrorist)
To: Howlin
"My campaign ran an ad that was intended to convey only that I did not oppose his nomination. "
How ridiculous is this statement!! Can you imagine an ad "I am proud not to oppose this nomination..." She got CAUGHT in a lie...and this is the best backtrack she can come up with. She is simply to STUPID to be in the Senate, in that case.
To: garandgal
I guess it depends on what the meaning of "es" es.
20
posted on
02/12/2003 11:43:55 PM PST
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson