Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam's Army
"Post hoc, ergo propter hoc?"

Not quite; I make no bones about the fact that there are/were atrocities in every conflict. My point is that we are better as a nation today because of the north's victory. So much of history would have been different otherwise and likely we would never have emerged as a world power.

I think you need to look up the meaning of the expression I used.

And I strongly refute your question of me being a liberal just because I think differently than the Lincoln-bashers.

I'm not sure how you refute a question. But if I may guess at your point, saying something doesn't make it a refutation.

ML/NJ

33 posted on 02/13/2003 12:00:37 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
"I think you need to look up the meaning of the expression I used."

Sorry, I guess I'm not as lofty as thee; I have no latin text and have yet to have a need for it while communicating in the real world.

"I'm not sure how you refute a question."

I just did. Is this a debate on an issue or a linguistics class, Dr Chomsky? What about my point of where we would be today had the war turned out different? That seems easily ignored in favor of a critique on fluffier matters.

34 posted on 02/13/2003 12:08:49 PM PST by Sam's Army (It's 2003, not 1863.........Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson