Skip to comments.
17 Charged With Hacking Into Satellite TV; violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...
Associated Press ^
Posted on 02/12/2003 12:23:33 PM PST by RCW2001
LOS ANGELES Feb. 12
A federal grand jury has indicted 17 people who authorities say hacked into satellite television transmissions, causing millions of dollars in losses to DirecTV and Dish Network, the U.S. Attorney's office said.
Six of the defendants were charged with violating the anti-encryption provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The other charges involved conspiracy or manufacturing a device for the purpose of stealing satellite signals. All three counts carry a maximum prison sentence of five years.
The indictments were returned last month and unsealed Tuesday.
Ten defendants already have agreed to plead guilty, authorities said, including a 43-year-old West Los Angeles man who has acknowledged causing $14.8 million in losses to satellite TV companies.
The investigation was aimed at people who develop software and hardware devices that crack the scrambled signals designed to limit satellite TV services to paying customers. DirecTV, for instances, uses "smart cards" as part of their set-top boxes that descramble satellite signals.
The defendants named Tuesday are charged with thwarting that security, often meeting in secret online chat rooms to exchange data and techniques and using such nicknames as "FreeTV," authorities said.
The defendants range in age from 19 to 52. Most live in California, although some are from Kentucky, North Carolina, Texas, Indiana, Florida and Ohio.
"This case demonstrates our commitment to identifying and prosecuting sophisticated computer hackers who steal the intellectual property of others for their own economic benefit," U.S. Attorney Debra Yang said.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-249 next last
To: TomB
Curiosity can be misconstrued as guilt ;-)
To: RoughDobermann
The Access Card will work only in the Receiving Equipment that it came with. Guess again ... and who gave them the right to make this ... will at all times remain the exclusive property of DIRECTV ... retroactive ?
62
posted on
02/12/2003 1:52:57 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: Registered
As I understand it, you can purchase used equipment (receiver, dish, LNBs, etc.), but a new smart card has to be purchased from Dish and programming service activated. That is predicated on agreeing to the residential agreement's conditions. But, I may be wrong. Checking.
To: clamper1797
You, and some others on this thread, are thinking legally, not ethically. Legally, you can develop an argument to counter just about anything (as we've all seen in recent years). Ethically there is no counter argument to stealing DirecTV's property; that is, the program signal.
By the way, the language on the DTV Access Card includes:
"The Access Card ... contain(s) trade secrets and are protected by United States and international copyright and other laws. You may not read, access, copy, modify, adapt, translate, decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, decode, download, ... the foregoing."
64
posted on
02/12/2003 1:53:46 PM PST
by
glennaro
To: Registered
I cancelled my dish subscription and they didn't ask for the card back. I own the reciever, so if I make my own smart card then I am not breaking any laws. I just can't tamper with theirs.
65
posted on
02/12/2003 1:54:10 PM PST
by
okkev68
To: Hodar
If, however, you bought your equipment, then signed a release for the card; I would be in total harmony with the legality. I agree with this ... BUT also if they don't want me to decode their signal ... keep it out of my house ... OH and I was NOT joking about making my own smart card ... who do you think helped designed these ....
66
posted on
02/12/2003 1:55:09 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: clamper1797
You can't legally begin programming service without activating your smart card through Dish Network. By activating the card, you've agreed to the agreement. This is clearly stated when you sign up (legally).
To: okkev68
One could use a similar argument to rationalize creating your own version of Microsoft Office by stealing the proprietary software codes.
68
posted on
02/12/2003 1:56:32 PM PST
by
glennaro
To: glennaro
You may not read, access, copy, modify, adapt, translate, decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, decode, download, ... the foregoing." Show me in the copyright law where it says I can't read read, access, copy, modify, adapt, translate, decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, decode, download, ... the foregoing for MY own uses (not for profit).
69
posted on
02/12/2003 1:57:31 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: RoughDobermann
You can't legally begin programming service without activating your smart card Guess again ... you really don't know what your talking about ... do you ?
70
posted on
02/12/2003 1:58:28 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: Hodar
Okay, say you by a system from Dish or a reseller. No, at that point, you have not agreed to anything. But, to enable the smart card (i.e., decode the signal to allow viewing), you have to agree to the conditions of the residential agreement.
To: clamper1797
Did you see me use the word "legally"?
To: glennaro
Microsoft Office by stealing the proprietary software codes. Microsoft does NOT pass these codes to you thru YOUR property every second of every day.
73
posted on
02/12/2003 2:00:39 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: thatsnotnice
I didnt see it in the article but Ill bet they were involved in some gimmick to make money from it. I bet they were selling an info pack or kit or something. 17 people cant steal 14-something million dollars worth of services without doing something like that.I think the charge had to do with a computation of how much revenue was lost by the provider
That surely is a put-up number.
74
posted on
02/12/2003 2:00:44 PM PST
by
IncPen
( Every bite of every sandwich is important - Warren Zevon, on his terminal cancer diagnosis)
To: RoughDobermann
But, to enable the smart card (i.e., decode the signal to allow viewing), you have to agree to the conditions of the residential agreement.And this is precisely what the hackers are doing. They have not signed anything, they buy the units at garage sales, or cheap units at Wal-Mart. They now OWN the units, and they then modify them.
Again, if the satelite companies would bother to sign the cards out, and then at least make an effort to control the number of cards out and about; I could have some sympathy. But, the truth is that they really have no idea how many cards are out in the market. Just because you toss the hardware, doesn't mean the card isn't on EBAY, or being used elsewhere.
75
posted on
02/12/2003 2:02:29 PM PST
by
Hodar
To: glennaro
Ethically there is no counter argument to stealing DirecTV's property; that is, the program signal.If you believe the DCMA is in any way ethical OR legal, then we have something to disagree upon.
The point being made is that by spraying their signal onto my property, like sunlight, it's mine.
76
posted on
02/12/2003 2:03:16 PM PST
by
IncPen
( Every bite of every sandwich is important - Warren Zevon, on his terminal cancer diagnosis)
To: RoughDobermann
enable the smart card (i.e., decode the signal to allow viewing), you have to agree to the conditions of the residential agreement Bull .... WRONG AGAIN ... That like saying if I sell you my car ... the instant YOU start it you agree have to buy my gasoline
77
posted on
02/12/2003 2:03:33 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
To: glennaro
Who said anything about stealing? I am sure someone could build a "smartcardless" receiver capable of unscrambling Dish networks signal. What laws have they violated?
I personally use cable because satellite internet isn't even close to the speeds I am getting with my modem.
78
posted on
02/12/2003 2:03:39 PM PST
by
okkev68
To: clamper1797
Legally. Get that? LEGALLY.
To: Registered
I don't know. Probably not, knowing them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-249 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson