Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

17 Charged With Hacking Into Satellite TV; violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...
Associated Press ^

Posted on 02/12/2003 12:23:33 PM PST by RCW2001

LOS ANGELES Feb. 12

A federal grand jury has indicted 17 people who authorities say hacked into satellite television transmissions, causing millions of dollars in losses to DirecTV and Dish Network, the U.S. Attorney's office said.

Six of the defendants were charged with violating the anti-encryption provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The other charges involved conspiracy or manufacturing a device for the purpose of stealing satellite signals. All three counts carry a maximum prison sentence of five years.

The indictments were returned last month and unsealed Tuesday.

Ten defendants already have agreed to plead guilty, authorities said, including a 43-year-old West Los Angeles man who has acknowledged causing $14.8 million in losses to satellite TV companies.

The investigation was aimed at people who develop software and hardware devices that crack the scrambled signals designed to limit satellite TV services to paying customers. DirecTV, for instances, uses "smart cards" as part of their set-top boxes that descramble satellite signals.

The defendants named Tuesday are charged with thwarting that security, often meeting in secret online chat rooms to exchange data and techniques and using such nicknames as "FreeTV," authorities said.

The defendants range in age from 19 to 52. Most live in California, although some are from Kentucky, North Carolina, Texas, Indiana, Florida and Ohio.

"This case demonstrates our commitment to identifying and prosecuting sophisticated computer hackers who steal the intellectual property of others for their own economic benefit," U.S. Attorney Debra Yang said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch
Remind me not to leave my wallet in the car next time I come to your house....you want it, you should be able to steal it. Right? It's on your property. Right?

Poor example, no one is denying anyone else the use of the data. The data is still there, unmolested and unchanged. If I steal your wallet, I have deprived you the use of it.

21 posted on 02/12/2003 1:01:50 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I may be totally wrong here, but isn't "receiving" an RF signal different than "listening/using" it? Aren't Dish and DirecTV arguing that you can receive the RF data at will, but not hack into it?
22 posted on 02/12/2003 1:02:35 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
If I choose to take it apart, is that a crime? Cool, I own my car, can I take apart the odometer?
23 posted on 02/12/2003 1:04:26 PM PST by luckodeirish (A pint, please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: luckodeirish
Cool, I own my car, can I take apart the odometer?

I don't see why not. If you alter the reading and then try to sell the car that would be fraud, but the mere act of examining your own property shouldn't be a crime. (I'm officially undecided as to whether this reasoning extends to the DirecTV case).

24 posted on 02/12/2003 1:08:47 PM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hodar; Poohbah
>The information is beamed down from satelites ACROSS the nation. ...it hits your property whether you like it or not.

Remember Heinlein's
classic "Waldo?" Broadcast bands
so saturated

with low power waves
that human nervous systems
became compromised...

(I remember this
story every time Apple
updates their AirPort...)

25 posted on 02/12/2003 1:09:41 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Remind me not to leave my wallet in the car next time I come to your house....you want it, you should be able to steal it. Right? It's on your property. Right?

Hacking implies modification. If I hack code, I change it. These people have not changed the signal, nor interfered with it. They just altered the way THEIR property handles it.

IMHO, if the satelite companies would LEASE, RENT, or manage the smart cards; this wouldn't be a problem. They have instead sold cards with units, and have made absolutely NO ATTEMPT to recover the cards from people who close their satelite accounts. Thereby inviting a community of 'Testers' to play with the systems. If I leave the keys in my car, I can be fined for 'inviting' the felonous car theft. The same faults lie here.

26 posted on 02/12/2003 1:10:19 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
causing $14.8 million in losses to satellite TV companies.

That is a hell-of-alot of tv viewing.

27 posted on 02/12/2003 1:11:21 PM PST by Keeper of the Turf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
If I leave the keys in my car, I can be fined for 'inviting' the felonous car theft

You can? Where do you live?

28 posted on 02/12/2003 1:14:58 PM PST by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Are you asserting that you have an absolute right to listen to your neighbor's encrypted wireless phone because you can detect the signal on your property?

I'll assert that.

29 posted on 02/12/2003 1:15:14 PM PST by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
(I'm officially undecided as to whether this reasoning extends to the DirecTV case).

Me neither, I was just having fun.

30 posted on 02/12/2003 1:15:49 PM PST by luckodeirish (A pint, please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: luckodeirish
Cool, I own my car, can I take apart the odometer?

Absolutely, you can do whatever you like to it. However, you MUST disclose that the mileage indicated is not actual when you sell it. Otherwise, that would be fraud. On your title transfer paperwork, there is even a checkbox to certify or disavow the indicated mileage.

31 posted on 02/12/2003 1:16:18 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Grit
If I leave the keys in my car, I can be fined for 'inviting' the felonous car theft

Texas. Much like failure to lock your door is grounds for your insurance company denying your burglary claim. If you do not do the minimum to safeguard your property, you share part of the blame for the theft thereof.

32 posted on 02/12/2003 1:18:32 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
You are the perfect example....thanks.


Rationalization....it's not just for children anymore...
33 posted on 02/12/2003 1:19:19 PM PST by SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch (I want it, therefore I should have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I think you're mistaking me with someone else with your quote...

As I understand it, Dish and DirecTV RF signals have a nationwide footprint and can be received by any receiver on those freqs. I don't beleive that they are arguing that people can't/shouldn't be able to receive those signals, but that the software running on the smart cards should not be modified to allow non-subscribers access to the resulting audio and video. These people ARE altering the software on the smart cards, which I don't believe they own. I think that when when you PURCHASE a system, you are only paying for the receiver and the physical dish, not the smart card. Your monthly charges are for programming which is enabled through your smart card. So, in a way, you are renting the smart card. I think I remember reading this on Dish's service agreement. I'll try to dig it up. FYI, you might want to go to www.dbstalk.com. Those guys are in the know...

34 posted on 02/12/2003 1:19:42 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
DirecTV programming content (i.e., the signal) is private property. To watch it legally, one needs to purchase the service.

From a moral or ethical perspective, if someone continues to receive the DirecTV service without paying for it (or without the company's permission) that person is a thief.

35 posted on 02/12/2003 1:21:18 PM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
There is a pretty big difference between an insurance co. denying a claim and a fine for inviting felonious theft.

Are there any fines for 'inviting' felonious rape?

36 posted on 02/12/2003 1:21:41 PM PST by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The airwaives are free. It is the descrambling code copyright that MIGHT be at issue. HOWEVER, this is not cable TV where you have to physically hook up a cable to someone's pole. Yes, police scanners used to pick up cell phones and there was NOTHING anyone could do since it was the airwaives. The solution was digital cellphones. (what next beathable air tax?)
37 posted on 02/12/2003 1:24:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; BartMan1
OK, so you're saying that you have an absolute right to decrypt military communications transmitted over SATCOM and then do whatever you want with the resulting data.

After all, the signal footprint makes it a "broadcast."

If something comes onto your property without you asking for it, it's yours. I'm thinking of someone putting a fence on your property; unless you complain and force its removal, in most states the law grants the easement to the incursor after some nominal amount of time

In this case the reverse would also seem to hold: if someone continually places their property (signal) on your property, at some point it becomes yours. A novel test of this theory would be to buy a descrambler and send DirectTV a letter every month telling them they're beaming their signal onto your property and you intend to use it unless they stop doing so.

Note that a cable company would not have this problem; they can simply turn off their signal at the street

It's fair use under copyright laws at the very least (the principle which sustains this very forum) provided you're not reselling it or profiting from it

The mere act of selling a device which someone might use for personal purposes likewise doesn't strike me as meritorious

The concept of "intellectual property" has been bastardized to the point of irrelevance

At the very least, the fact that they're citing DMCA tells me they don't have much of a leg to stand on

38 posted on 02/12/2003 1:24:48 PM PST by IncPen ( Every bite of every sandwich is important - Warren Zevon, on his terminal cancer diagnosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Do the "airwaves" belong to the people of the USA?

What if I develop a signal that goes outside of, over, around or between the currently recognized "spectrum," is it mine or does it belong to the people of the USA?

39 posted on 02/12/2003 1:28:23 PM PST by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grit
Quick Google search result: http://www.townonline.com/westroxbury/news/local_regional/wrt_newpwcars01302003.htm

From article:It is technically against state law to leave a car idling, because the is bad for the environment. Murray urges drivers to be smart and lock up at all times.

40 posted on 02/12/2003 1:31:31 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson