Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Straw rejects bid to fend off conflict
The Evening Standard ^ | February 11, 2003 | Patrick Hennessy and Robert Fox

Posted on 02/11/2003 4:45:37 AM PST by MadIvan

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw today set out to reject a plan by France, Germany and Russia to fend off the threat of war in Iraq through more weapons inspections.

He was due to say that even a "thousand-fold" increase in the number of inspectors could not guarantee disarmament by Saddam Hussein.

Mr Straw was making his London address as a row splitting Nato raged on over the decision by France, Belgium and Germany to veto plans to protect Turkey from military fallout from a Gulf conflict.

As ambassadors met in Brussels today in a desperate bid to find a way forward, France's President Jacques Chirac and Russia's President Vladimir Putin expressed determination to seek a diplomatic resolution to the Iraq crisis.

Together with Germany, the two countries are expected to use Friday's meeting of the United Nations Security Council to table a plan for a major increase in inspector numbers and the extension of no-fly zones to the whole of Iraq.

Mr Putin predicted a majority of the council would back the scheme, while M Chirac said: "There is still an alternative to war. We are sure of it."

But Mr Straw was set to warn: "Lethal viruses can be produced in an area the size of the average living-room. In the absence of Iraqi cooperation, even a thousandfold increase in the inspectors' capabilities will not allow us to establish with any degree of confidence that Iraq has disarmed. If Saddam bows to the UN demand and co-operates promptly, what is the need for greater numbers of inspectors? If he maintains his refusal to co-operate, how will higher numbers help?"

The Franco-German proposal has already been dismissed by Washington and the countries' veto of the deployment of Nato Patriot missiles to Turkey has sparked fury in America-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld characterised the veto as "shameful".

The US is sticking to its timetable for war on Saddam, and will go it alone if necessary to protect Turkey.

Ground operations in Iraq are likely to start in less than six weeks, according to defence analysts in Washington and London. Most British and American units will be in place in and around the Gulf by the end of this month.

A ferocious bombing campaign of about two weeks will begin early in March, with ground operations beginning around 21 March.

President Bush is likely to take no notice of a plea from the chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix for more time for his inspectors when he presents his next report on Friday.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: belgium; blair; bush; chirach; france; germany; iraq; michel; nato; saddam; schroeder; turkey; uk; usa
With you at the first, with you to the last.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 02/11/2003 4:45:37 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blue Scourge; PhiKapMom; carl in alaska; Cautor; GOP_Lady; prairiebreeze; veronica; SunnyUsa; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 02/11/2003 4:45:49 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
To be honest, I think 100,000 inspectors could do it - especially if they're U.S. Marines...
3 posted on 02/11/2003 4:54:42 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
If Saddam bows to the UN demand and co-operates promptly, what is the need for greater numbers of inspectors? If he maintains his refusal to co-operate, how will higher numbers help?

Precisely!!!

4 posted on 02/11/2003 5:00:53 AM PST by fatrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Straw's logic is reassuring. Anti-war protestors say:
Increase the number of inspectors. That should do the trick.

Straw:

In the absence of Iraqi cooperation, even a thousandfold increase in the inspectors' capabilities will not allow us to establish with any degree of confidence that Iraq has disarmed.

The anti-war protestors have thrown away logic. In the end, in order to be certain that Saddam has disarmed, the UN would need thousands of inspectors (and troops to enforce the inspection regime).

In the end, they would be doing the same thing as we want to do now. The major difference being, that under their plan, France and Germany would have a chance to destroy any evidence that is damning to them.

5 posted on 02/11/2003 5:05:33 AM PST by syriacus (Cloning and ESCR -- hammers used to solve all problems, even when tweezers are best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Haven't I already read this morning that Saddamn won't agree to the idea of UN "peacekeeper" troops?? Thought I'd read that.

Prairie
6 posted on 02/11/2003 6:00:04 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
UK ROCKS !!!
7 posted on 02/11/2003 7:26:56 AM PST by Copperhead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Regards to you, MadIvan. Is Tony Blair still with us in the war on Iraq without U.N. approval or a second resolution? I know his back is against the wall.
8 posted on 02/11/2003 7:36:42 AM PST by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson