To: TLBSHOW
Grover Norquist is an Islamist sympathizer, an Amnesty appeaser, and a general dirtbag. I don't care if he's for low taxes or worked for the NRA, he is not to be trusted.
![](http://members.shaw.ca/brightstar1/Sabertooth.jpg)
To: Sabertooth
Grover Norquist is an Islamist sympathizer
bump
4 posted on
02/10/2003 9:25:02 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Sabertooth
Grover Norquist is an Islamist sympathizer, an Amnesty appeaser, and a general dirtbag. I don't care if he's for low taxes or worked for the NRA, he is not to be trusted. A-FRICKIN-MEN.
To: All
There appear to have been at least nine other meetings that these groups have attended with the White House and senior Administration officials since September 2001, some at the invitation of a predecessor of Mr. Tulbah in the role of gatekeeper for the Administration's Muslim "outreach efforts, Suhail khan.
6 posted on
02/10/2003 9:33:37 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Sabertooth
Grover Norquist is an Islamist sympathizer
LAMB: You also say that Grover Norquist, who -- who is he, by the way?
SCHWARTZ: Well, Grover Norquist is a very prominent fund-raiser, and what can I say, wheeler dealer and fixer in the Republican Party, Republican circles and in the conservative movement. And Mr. Norquist is someone who had -- prior to September 11, had cultivated the Muslim leadership in the United States, the Arab-American leadership in the United States, and had attempted to bring the American Muslim and Arab-American communities into the Republican camp, kind of as a parallel, I think, to the role of Jews in the Democratic Party. And he had formed an alliance which still he maintains with, essentially, the same group of people, the same Wahhabi, Saudi-backed radical Muslim figures who have had and had taken over and continue to exercise great influence in the leadership of the American Muslim community.
LAMB: Again, what`s wrong with this?
SCHWARTZ: Well, what`s wrong with this is, first of all -- there are several things wrong with it. There`s an abstract issue, and that is that the American republic cannot and should not take the official position or even a semi-official position that Wahhabi Islam, Saudi Islam, is the only form of Islam. This is what the Saudis and Wahhabis wanted and got, to a great extent. We cannot have a situation where the United States of America, whether as a community of believers or as an intellectual community or as a political factor, goes on the assumption that in dealing with Islam, we have to only deal with Wahhabis and Saudis. This is -- this is -- this is giving up the field to the extremists. This is giving up the field to the people who are -- were, in fact, the ideological preparers of September 11, the ideological backers and supporters of September 11.
For more
http://www.booknotes.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1713
The Two Faces of Islam: The House of Saud from Tradition to Terror
by Stephen Schwartz
7 posted on
02/10/2003 9:51:15 PM PST by
Valin
(Age and Deceit, beat youth and skill)
To: Sabertooth
13 posted on
02/10/2003 10:03:39 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Sabertooth
Yes, This Is About Islam
By SALMAN RUSHDIE
ONDON -- "This isn't about Islam." The world's leaders have been repeating this mantra for weeks, partly in the virtuous hope of deterring reprisal attacks on innocent Muslims living in the West, partly because if the United States is to maintain its coalition against terror it can't afford to suggest that Islam and terrorism are in any way related.
The trouble with this necessary disclaimer is that it isn't true. If this isn't about Islam, why the worldwide Muslim demonstrations in support of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda? Why did those 10,000 men armed with swords and axes mass on the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier, answering some mullah's call to jihad? Why are the war's first British casualties three Muslim men who died fighting on the Taliban side?
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/02/opinion/02RUSH.html?ex=1005990007&ei=1&en=1145e2dba353a885
18 posted on
02/10/2003 10:28:17 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson