Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dude, you're getting a Dell guy' arrested last night on Marijuana charge
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/delldude1.html ^

Posted on 02/10/2003 7:49:25 AM PST by rs79bm

Benjamin Curtis, the 22-year old actor who portrays the Dell Guy in those bothersome computer commercials, was arrested late last night (2/9) on a marijuana possession charge, The Smoking Gun has learned. According to cops, Curtis was holding a "small bag of marijuana" when he was popped on Manhattan's Lower East Side (at Ludlow and Rivington for you Gothamites). Curtis is currently being held in Central Booking and is scheduled to be arraigned later today in Manhattan Criminal Court. Curtis, who lives in lower Manhattan, was charged with criminal possession of marijuana, a misdemeanor. Bonnie Shumofsky, the actor's agent, said she was unaware of her client's bust when contacted this morning by TSG. (1 page)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: addictedloser; badspokesman; badspokespeople; bennygotdelled; computerindustry; computers; dell; dellcomputer; dellstoner; dudeurgoin2jail; dudeyouregettin2to10; duuuuudewhoaaaa; justsaynoelle; legalizepot; lisforloser; loser; nonaddictedwinner; publicrelations; saynottopot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381 next last
To: clamper1797
Lighten up DUDES. He was merely doing research for the role, besides when the cops nailed him they thought they were busting him for puffing on a Winston.
101 posted on 02/10/2003 8:35:52 AM PST by YOMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: Constitution Day

103 posted on 02/10/2003 8:36:49 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
My prediction: This will end his Dell career and insure at least a trial run with Hollywood. I happen to like the kid. He is funny and his run of commercials was certainly successful.

And he ends it all by being caught with a bag of oregano...make that grass..or whatever. Bad bad boy. Carrying around a bag of dead weeds. You are a threat to society.

104 posted on 02/10/2003 8:39:05 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
Yeah, it's marijuana now, but that inevitably leads to arson, rape, axe murder, cattle rustling, and genocide. Or worse, he might end up shilling for Microsoft.

Well, another squeaky-clean media icon turns out to have feet of clay. Oh, well. At least we still have Snoop Dogg...

105 posted on 02/10/2003 8:39:47 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm

"BOGUS!"
106 posted on 02/10/2003 8:40:59 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

107 posted on 02/10/2003 8:42:41 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
It is worthwhile for self-proclaimed "conservatives" to consider the fact that in 1919, Congress and the nation thought it necessary to pass a Constitutional Amendment to ban alcoholic beverages.

That Urban Myth again?

"National prohibition took effect at midnight, January 16, 1920, one year after ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment. BUT, the Lever Food and Fuel Control Act of August 1917 banned the production of distilled spirits for the duration of the war. The War Prohibition Act of November 1918 forbade the manufacture and sale of all intoxicating beverages of more than 2.75 percent alcohol content, beer and wine as well as hard liquor, until demobilization was completed."

The Prohibition Amendment was enacted because Temperance forces saw it as less susceptible to repeal than legislation.

"An amendment to the Constitution obviously appealed to temperance reformers more than a federal statute banning liquor. A simple congressional majority could adopt a statute but, with the shift of a relatively few votes, could likewise topple one. Drys feared that an ordinary law would be in constant danger of being overturned owing to pressure from liquor industry interests or the growing population of liquor-using immigrants. A constitutional amendment, on the other hand, though more difficult to achieve, would be impervious to change. Their reform would not only have been adopted, the Anti-Saloon League reasoned, but would be protected from future human weakness and backsliding."

Repealing National Prohibition by David Kyvig, Copyright 1979 by the University of Chicago


108 posted on 02/10/2003 8:42:44 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: unix

109 posted on 02/10/2003 8:43:16 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
>>>...Bad law, pot should be legal.

I'll bet you are a Libertarian.

I can tell because they just want to sit around and smoke dope.

110 posted on 02/10/2003 8:43:56 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: unix

I never knew who she was, but apparently, she has quite a following based on a google search...

111 posted on 02/10/2003 8:44:51 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
I didn't know it was legal to sell this stuff but I guess it is....

Oh come on, thats for smoking tobacco or storing jelly beans.

112 posted on 02/10/2003 8:45:05 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ewing
heheheh...
113 posted on 02/10/2003 8:45:15 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
The old one? I think his first commerical he was doing a Eddie Haskell routine, getting parents to buy a Dell for their kid, if I remember correctly. I saw Cavuto interview him once, and he was quite different away from the commercial script. He had bigger and better things in mind then besides Dell. But not getting busted. Ha.
114 posted on 02/10/2003 8:45:23 AM PST by FoxGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Dangerous criminal, he should be given life.

Aaaaw... The soft-on-crime, it-isn't-their-fault, society's-to-blame left has chimed in. Life? He should be SHOT!

HE'S A MENACE TO SOCIETY!

HE SHOULD BE PUT UP AGAINST A WALL!!

KILL!! KILL!! KILL!! KILL!! KILL!! KILL!! KILL!! KILL!!

...cuz drugs are dangerous. Drugs kill.

115 posted on 02/10/2003 8:45:27 AM PST by Redcloak (Jøìn thë Çøålìtìon tø Prëvënt the Åbûsë of Ûnnëçëssårìlÿ Lëngthÿ, Vërbøsë ånd Nønsënsìçål Tåg Lìnës)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: unix
Dude, you're KILLING me over here. :)
116 posted on 02/10/2003 8:46:41 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)
I'll bet your a statist.
I can tell because they just want to sit around and tell others what to do.
117 posted on 02/10/2003 8:47:03 AM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
http://www.blurofinsanity.com/mugshots/mugshot_horror.html
118 posted on 02/10/2003 8:47:06 AM PST by ErnBatavia ((Bumperootus!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)
I'll bet you're a National Merit Scholar, judging from your command of both logic and state-approved curricula.
119 posted on 02/10/2003 8:47:08 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"He's a stoner? No way < /sarcasm >"

No doubt conducting research for his "character"......:)

120 posted on 02/10/2003 8:47:46 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson