Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meenie
White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales is NOT the same person as U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C.) Nominee Miguel Estrada.

Mr. Gonzales is the one who watered down Ted Olsen's University of Michigan brief. Miguel Estrada's nomination to the D.C. Appeals Court is currently being opposed by the Dems because they fear he is PRO-LIFE and may eventually be nominated to the United States Supreme Court and overturn Roe v. Wade.

Two separate individuals. Two separate issues.

17 posted on 02/10/2003 6:27:19 AM PST by arasina (DRY CLEAN ONLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: arasina
I support a VOTE on Estrada regardless. Two years is an absurd wait. Still, I'd like to know what makes you think Estrada is pro-life. I'd never vote for a federal judge that did not think Roe v. Wade was bad law. It is terrible law and terrible justice. I have heard Estrada was for abortion, but little details. Do you have any pro-life details?
21 posted on 02/10/2003 6:43:17 AM PST by Ahban (he who picks the terms wins the debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: arasina
My fault. You're right.
55 posted on 02/10/2003 5:08:49 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson