To: meenie
White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales is NOT the same person as U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C.) Nominee Miguel Estrada.
Mr. Gonzales is the one who watered down Ted Olsen's University of Michigan brief. Miguel Estrada's nomination to the D.C. Appeals Court is currently being opposed by the Dems because they fear he is PRO-LIFE and may eventually be nominated to the United States Supreme Court and overturn Roe v. Wade.
Two separate individuals. Two separate issues.
17 posted on
02/10/2003 6:27:19 AM PST by
arasina
(DRY CLEAN ONLY)
To: arasina
I support a VOTE on Estrada regardless. Two years is an absurd wait. Still, I'd like to know what makes you think Estrada is pro-life. I'd never vote for a federal judge that did not think Roe v. Wade was bad law. It is terrible law and terrible justice. I have heard Estrada was for abortion, but little details. Do you have any pro-life details?
21 posted on
02/10/2003 6:43:17 AM PST by
Ahban
(he who picks the terms wins the debate)
To: arasina
My fault. You're right.
55 posted on
02/10/2003 5:08:49 PM PST by
meenie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson