1 posted on
02/10/2003 3:05:07 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Estrada did not help himself when he watered down Ted Olsen's argument against affirmative action at the University of Michigan. In looking for a strict constructionist on the Constitution, I fail to see where affirmative action can meet the test. This places Estrada in the camp of revisionists which we DON'T need.
2 posted on
02/10/2003 3:22:34 AM PST by
meenie
To: kattracks
Bump
To: kattracks
Wonder why Giuliani did not name Schumer by name as one of the chief obstructionists?
To: kattracks
He is supported by no fewer than 16 Hispanic groups, who express enormous pride at the prospect of the first Hispanic joining one of America's most prestigious courts. Why don't they quit using racism altogether? If they want him in because he's a hispanic, then they can't really complain when the democrats decide he isn't hispanic enough. He shouldn't be appointed because he's a hispanic but because he's the right man for the job.
14 posted on
02/10/2003 5:52:14 AM PST by
FITZ
To: kattracks
Note who wrote this article...Rudy. Thinking about running against Schumer???
22 posted on
02/10/2003 7:10:27 AM PST by
votelife
To: kattracks; All
On C-SPAN2 now.
To: kattracks
It will be delightful to see the RATS gut themselves on this issue.
35 posted on
02/10/2003 10:34:37 AM PST by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: kattracks
bump for Estrada
To: kattracks
Thank you, Rudy
To: kattracks
Some note that Estrada lacks judicial experience.Did Thurgood Marshall have any judicial experience before he was nominated to the Judiciary by Lyndon Johnson? Did Justice Marshall argue as many cases before the Supreme Court as Estrada?
56 posted on
02/10/2003 7:48:45 PM PST by
reg45
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson