Posted on 02/09/2003 10:49:02 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
NewsMax.com
Sunday Feb. 9, 2003
Albright: I Don't Know Why Clinton Turned Down Bin Laden Deal--
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said Sunday that she couldn't explain why ex-president Bill Clinton turned down a deal with the government of Sudan to take Osama bin Laden into custody seven years ago. But she admitted that, "obviously, in hindsight, one would wish that some other action had been taken."
Albright feigned ignorance of the Clinton-bin Laden extradition deal during the following exchange with NBC "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert:
RUSSERT: In May of 1996 under pressure from the United States and Saudi Arabia, the Sudanese government asked bin Laden to leave. He returned to Afghanistan permanently..... Was it a mistake to let Osama bin Laden leave Sudan - or at least not apprehend him in Qatar on his way to Afghanistan?
ALBRIGHT: As I understand it, and I was ambassador to the U.N. at the time, was that basically we felt that he was too intricately involved with some of the activities in Sudan, which was a major issue for us. And that it was better to get him out of there.
Obviously, in hindsight, one would wish that some other action had been taken. But, for the most part, that was a decision made on the basis of information at that time, that he was playing the terrorist game there and that there had in fact been terrorist activity. As you know, there was an attempt on President Mubarak's life that came out of that area. And that it was probably better to move (bin Laden) out.
RUSSERT: But why not capture him, apprehend him while he was refueling in Qatar?
ALBRIGHT: I can't answer that question. (End of excerpt)
While Ms. Albright claims she doesn't know the answer to that question, Mr. Russert certainly does - though he declined to challenge her. But in fact, in May 1996, ex-President Clinton gave the order not to take bin Laden into custody, a blunder he confessed in a speech to a Long Island, N.Y. business group last year.
"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan," Clinton told the Long Island Association in on Feb. 15, 2002.
"And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."
Clinton continued:
"So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan." (End of Excerpt)
Though Mr. Clinton's confession has been widely covered in such high profile venues as the Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor," "Hannity & Colmes," WOR Radio's "The Bob Grant Show" and, just the night before Albright' protested her ignorance, WABC Radio's "Batchelor & Alexander Show," network news organizations like Russert's NBC News have embargoed coverage of the bombshell development. ( Click Here to listen to Bill Clinton admit that he let bin Laden off the hook.)
The big media cover-up has allowed New York Sen. Hillary Clinton to escape confrontation on the issue of her husband's blunder. And two weeks ago, in an interview with WLIE Radio's Mike Siegel, she tried to blame President Bush for "mishandling" North Korea and for not stopping Osama bin Laden before 9/11.
"Our" government "created" people like Osama bin Laden and Sadam Hussein (just as Israel created Hamas) - and later set out to destroy them - for reasons that have very little to do with the reasons stated for public consumption. Suffice it to say, had Bin Laden not existed, "our" government would have had to create him. Capturing him at such an early date, before he had done much of anything, would have not served the agenda that "our" government is following.
That is interesting. I had not seen that before. How did you learn it and how can I check it out?
"In the first days after the terror attacks on New York and Washington, Saudi Arabia supervised the urgent evacuation of 24 members of Osama bin Laden's extended family from the United States, fearing that they might be subjected to violence," the New York Times reported on Sept. 30, 2001.
In his first interview after the attacks, Prince Bandar told the Times that private planes carrying the kingdom's deputy defense minister and the governor of Mecca, both members of the royal family, were grounded - initially caught up in the FBI dragnet. Both planes were loaded up with bin Laden relatives and allowed to leave when airports reopened three days later.....
"The F.B.I., informed of the flight by the F.A.A., searched the family's luggage and briefly interviewed those without diplomatic passports, and watched the bin Ladens depart," he wrote.
But I definetly admit that I misrepresented that article.
Exactly how did our government 'create' them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.