Bush May Tap Brown for Supreme Court

MSNBC, NEWSWEEK ^ | 2-9-2003 | Daniel Klaidman, Debra Rosenberg and Tamara Lipper

[KLT]

Why, Justice Brown is a pretty nice lookin' lady.

Wouldn't mind borking her meself!

Brian, Brian, Brian...get your mind out of the gutter...LOL

[KLT]

Thank you TaRaRa....now I got the message...great pics by the way...

Greetings From The Socialist and Baby Killing Capitol Of The World NY,

Karen

[KLT]

Only Anita Hill, talks about that stuff....

[ultima ratio]

How do you bork a qualified African-American without alienating a part of your base? People forget Clarence Thomas got through because demz couldn't take the heat after they tried to bork him. It'll be ten times harder with a black woman candidate.

[Brian Allen]

Bit rough, eh?

Thought so the [MILI]second I clicked on Post.

Thought I'd gotten away with it, too.

Until now.

Justice's wheels turn slow, , my Grandma used to say -- but grind exceeding fine ....

HehHehHeh ......

[Bubba_Leroy]

I don't know anything about Brown. I do know that if MSNBC calls her a "conservative" that means she is a moderate liberal. If she were a genuine conservative than MSNBC would call her a "right wing fanatic."

[Bubba_Leroy]

If Rehnquist steps down, I'd like to see Bush pick Thomas for Chief Justice and Brown for Thomas' seat. Let the demonRATs try borking two African Americans at once.

[185JHP]

There once was a saying that "Only two groups of people are really free in this country - black women and white men" (meaning they can say whatever they want). A good test of that could be forthcoming!

[Long Cut]

I just scanned the first few posts, so if this has been answered, please point me to the relevent post:

I'm a bit different from most here regarding potential judges; their opinions regarding abortion, for instance, mean as less than nothing to me.

What I would REALLY like to know about Judge Brown is, how does she feel about such REAL issues as the Second Ammendment, the War On Drugs, private property, free speech, and OTHER direct Constitutional issues.

Would she vote to overturn restrictive gun laws? How about seizures of property by environmental agencies? does she support the Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion, and the Rights of Assembly and Grievance? What about Privacy?

Sorry to be blunt, but by zeroing on peripheral issues such as abortion to the exclusion of all others can be to risk a dangerous appointee. I WILL NOT trade all my OTHER rights so half the population should LOSE one of theirs.

[Shooter 2.5]

"The implication of her decision is that freedom of speech could be outlawed in Wyoming by a state constitution amendment. What dangerous nonsense."

The U.S. Supreme Court already ruled on the Right of Free Speach. They haven't yet ruled on the Second Amendment. Why do you think we have gun control in states like California that have no Right to Keep and Bear Arms in their state Constitution?

[A2J]

How conservative is she?

[Kevin Curry]

She looks like the real deal. Team her up with Scalia and Thomas, and there will be a solid and aggressive conservative core on the SCOTUS.

I'll wager that the DUpers are mortified at this suggestion.

[nwrep]

Please read the first 20 or so posts. They will answer your Q.

[Long Cut]

Thanks. I appreciate it, it's Sunday and raining, so I feel lazy.

[Coleus]

Janice Brown, ask me again and I'll knock you down.

[Shooter 2.5]

Two of the same article on the bang list.

[lawdude]

"Brown sounds like an excellent choice...."

Based on what criteria/resume items?

[VRWC_minion]

Based on what you posted she seems like she is subordinate to the legislature unless the constitution contradicts them. You cannot ask for more than that. Any more and she would be an activist.

[Long Cut]

Okay, so AT BEST, we have no idea HOW Judge Brown would vote regarding the Second Ammendment. On other matters, she does seem mildly right-wing. Hmmm.

I'm back to wondering just how long the Republicans are going to let the Dims force them to scour the nation for the two or three conservative, minority, and qualified justices out there. Couldn't we just, for the love of God, find someone who REGARDLESS of Race, Color, Creed, or Planet-Of-Origin can just read the Constitution and apply it consistently to disputes regarding it? When will we stop placing that document, ALL of it, at risk just so the Dims won't squeal like pigs (which they'll do anyway)? There must be THOUSANDS of qualified jurists and other citizens who could do the job and about whom we'd NEVER need to worry.

[Dan from Michigan]

That's what it looks to me from the information I had. California has no RKBA, so that answers that question, but I need to know how they argued against the AW ban there. If the challengers mentioned the 2nd amendment IN THEIR briefs, it can sway me against.

I need to look that up. I'll admit that I have a prejudice against Californias to start with on gun issues, so I need to be certain before I saw "This person deserves me support".

My first choice is either Robert Young, Stephen Markman, Cliff Taylor, or Maura Corrigan. Those four run Michigan's Supreme Court and are strict constitutionalists.