Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The end of the universe is cancelled
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | February 9, 2003 | Robert Matthews

Posted on 02/08/2003 5:43:08 PM PST by MadIvan

Professor Hawking, we have a problem. Nasa, the American space agency, is expected to announce this week that it has proved the existence of "dark energy", a cosmic force that counteracts gravity and will keep the universe expanding forever.

The announcement will effectively demolish the theory that life will be wiped out in a "Big Crunch" when the universe collapses, and should end decades of academic dispute over the forces at work on the universe.

In the past, scientists ranging from Prof Stephen Hawking, the Cambridge University physicist, to Albert Einstein, have argued that the universe eventually will stop expanding and then implode under the force of gravity, destroying all life.

Nasa's research indicates, however, that this analysis is wrong. Using a satellite - the Microwave Anistropy Probe (Map) - which has spent the past year peering into deep space, Nasa has discovered a pattern of "hot spots" which, it says, proves that the universe is accelerating.

This means that "dark energy" - the only force that could cause this acceleration - does exist, and that the universe is expanding too quickly to collapse under gravity, ruling out the possibility of a "Big Crunch".

Prof Anthony Lasenby, an astrophysicist at Cambridge University, told The Telegraph that the announcement would transform our view of the universe. "It will be an epoch-making event," he said.

Another scientist explained: "It is like throwing a ball in the air. If gravity were the only force at work, the ball would eventually slow down and then start to fall back. What this shows is that the ball is not slowing down but is in fact accelerating away."

The Nasa discovery is understood to be one of the most significant in the history of cosmology and, coming only days after the loss of the space shuttle Columbia, will provide a timely reminder of the value of the agency's scientific work.

The behaviour of the universe is a subject that has troubled some of the greatest minds in science.

In 1917, in order to balance the equations in his General Theory of Relativity, Einstein argued that an unknown force - which he labelled the "cosmological constant" - was counteracting gravity and keeping the universe a constant size. In the wake of subsequent astronomical evidence that the universe was expanding, however, he abandoned this idea, calling it his greatest mistake.

The new data will show that Einstein's attempt to fiddle his equations using this "cosmological constant" may have been right, albeit for entirely the wrong reasons.

In his 1998 bestseller A Brief History of Time, Prof Hawking claimed that the universe would eventually implode.

This assessment was challenged in 1997 when, after observations from ground-based telescopes, astronomers began to argue that gravity was counteracted by a "dark energy" that was causing the universe to expand at an ever-increasing rate.

Nasa's study, however, the most detailed of the whole sky, is poised to settle the controversy. It uses measurements of the heat left over from the Big Bang, in which the universe was born 14 billion years ago, to demonstrate that the universe is expanding rapidly and is safe from collapse.

Last night Prof Hawking remained undaunted by the Nasa findings, saying that he had continued working on his theories and had discovered that they were "quite compatible with the universe expanding forever" and the existence of dark energy.

Although Nasa's discovery means that the universe will go on forever, the same is not true for human life. As the universe expands, all the energy needed to keep the stars and galaxies alight will be used up.

What will remain is a universe full of black holes, which after trillions of years, will explode to leave nothing but dark energy.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bigcrunch; cancelled; crevolist; end; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: PatrickHenry
The end of the universe is cancelled

Drat! I had tickets for good seats!

21 posted on 02/08/2003 6:17:47 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
rofl!
22 posted on 02/08/2003 6:17:48 PM PST by visualops (Currently cranked: Rhapsody - Legendary Tales - "Ira Tenax")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
Been there. It is way overrated IMO.
23 posted on 02/08/2003 6:21:24 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I would prefer to refer to the "dark energy" as freedom.

Freedom counteracts gravity. Freedom extends time and space.

IMHO

But Hawking is still a cool guy.

24 posted on 02/08/2003 6:27:48 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The end of the universe is cancelled......great now I can still take my ZOLOFT.......
25 posted on 02/08/2003 6:28:03 PM PST by exmoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I'll wait for the paperback.
26 posted on 02/08/2003 6:28:04 PM PST by openotherend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker; Billy_bob_bob; new cruelty
FYI...

Hollywood has taken up Adams' screenplay for Hitchhiker's. The entire series (I think) is scheduled for big screen. Hitchhikers is in pre-production now.

27 posted on 02/08/2003 6:28:10 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
Would you have given a nice tip to Marvin for parking your car?
28 posted on 02/08/2003 6:28:30 PM PST by KantianBurke (Germany needs another round of carpet bombing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
thanks for the info. i have the old bbc shows on tape. the movie should be a hoot.
29 posted on 02/08/2003 6:29:37 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob; uglybiker
Or at least, the meal will be cheaper because you won't get such a good show.
30 posted on 02/08/2003 6:33:48 PM PST by PianoMan (prefer music to hot air)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Would it have mattered?

Here I am, brain the size of a planet and I'm reduced to parking cars. God! I'm so depressed....

31 posted on 02/08/2003 6:34:18 PM PST by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Let's hope they dump Zaphod Beebelbrox's second head. That was such a lame device, even in the book it was lame, in the BBC series it was unbearable. I don't care how many special effects they use, or if the second head is some big star, the basic idea sucked in the book and it will suck in the movie. Dump Zaphod's second head!
32 posted on 02/08/2003 6:34:38 PM PST by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
I remember that being announced shortly before Douglas Adams's death. There was a discussion here on FR as to who would be able to pull a project like that off.

My vote was for Terry Gilliam.

33 posted on 02/08/2003 6:36:16 PM PST by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
seems right up his alley.
34 posted on 02/08/2003 6:36:54 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Hmmm.... A cheaper meal means more money to go toward Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters!
35 posted on 02/08/2003 6:38:41 PM PST by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: friendly

2 Peter 3:10 (NIV) 10But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare.£
36 posted on 02/08/2003 6:40:48 PM PST by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; ThinkPlease; Piltdown_Woman; aBootes
Alright, let's get things rolling here. You've read Guth's book, PH; what's the deal -- is dark energy, which enables an ever expanding Universe, compatible with the Inflationary model, which requires the matter density of the Universe to be the critical value; i.e., the value that would lead to a flat Geometry and a "parabolic" rate of expansion (if there were no dark energy)?


37 posted on 02/08/2003 6:43:31 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
well if he gets enough tips he might one day be able to get all the diodes on his left side fixed
38 posted on 02/08/2003 6:44:42 PM PST by KantianBurke (Germany needs another round of carpet bombing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
My vote was for Terry Gilliam.

oh, my..... that would be too good.

39 posted on 02/08/2003 6:45:04 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Entropy wins, again!
40 posted on 02/08/2003 6:55:23 PM PST by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson