Sigh.... I see it's once again up to me to supply the obvious pun:
It's now the "Old Gey Lady."
If, after this recent Blair flap, anyone takes anything they publish and report, seriously, then they've got a few screws loose.
It's a tired, leftist rag that's been exposed for it's hypocrisy, lies, and kow-towing to affirmative action hires and "di-verrrr-ssss-iiiii-ttttt-yyyyyy" (<- to be read in Michael Savage voice).
So they're also filled with fags, too, according to this guy.
So what?
The paper is a rag. It's a joke. If this latest Blair scandal wasn't enough to put the stake through the vampire's heart, then nothing is for some people. So they'll continue to read it, and the rest of us who've long known what's what have all the proof we ever needed to ignore anything they say (as if we already didn't).
The paper is a joke. It's trash. It's leftist bilge. Who reads it anyway, except the Peter Jennings crowd? Would anything like the Blair story change their opinion of the rag anyway? Of course not. You could find out that Karl Marx himself had been cloned and was secretly the "Uber-editor" for the past thirty years, and still the Jennings crowd would read it, and think it was "all the news that's fit to print".
We all know better. We knew better before. The Blair thing simply blew it all sky high and proved it to the rest beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's a filthy socialist propaganda rag. Hopefully the Blair thing will help diminish its influence. Doesn't matter to me, though, one way or the other. I never read it, and never will. So nothing has changed for me, at least.