1 posted on
02/07/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by
RCW2001
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: RCW2001
Good news, actually. French diplomatic incompetence may will put an end to UN diplomatic incompetence. Nothing wrong with a "two-fer."
To: RCW2001
this is a false lead headline...I watched the presser and basically they called on Iraq to "get with the program" by 2-14
47 posted on
02/07/2003 9:53:41 AM PST by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: RCW2001
I'd never thought I'd see the day when France would burn their bridges so badly with any nation besides Britain. But they've done it. I doubt anyone in America is going to forget this treachery.
Regards, Ivan
49 posted on
02/07/2003 9:56:07 AM PST by
MadIvan
To: RCW2001
"We haven't gone to the end, far from it...there is still an alternative to war," Chirac said after meeting Finnish Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen in Paris. "...par exemple, nous pourrions la reddition immobile, qui n'a pas été essayée encore ", Chirac continued. ("for example, we could still surrender, that has not been tried yet".)
50 posted on
02/07/2003 10:02:19 AM PST by
Dan Day
To: RCW2001
France is not an ally, it is an enemy. It is Saddam's ally.
52 posted on
02/07/2003 10:02:36 AM PST by
tomahawk
To: RCW2001
France obviously is hiding something
53 posted on
02/07/2003 10:03:22 AM PST by
smith288
("Don't worry about me. If something happens, I've just gone on higher.")
To: RCW2001
"We haven't gone to the end, far from it...there is still an alternative to war,"
There is ALWAYS an alternative to war. It's never too late to surrender.
56 posted on
02/07/2003 10:05:53 AM PST by
mlo
To: RCW2001
Those French are also concerned the American buildup in Guam! will cause the "mer de feu" in Seoul. It's been a while, but didn't the decay of the West begin in France about the middle of the 19th century? Of course, nobody can do decadence like the French.
To: RCW2001
Oh, gosh. The French spectator walked out of the theater? Oh, well, on with the show!
To: RCW2001
Wah, wah Pierre!
Are these people nuts or something? Or just greedy?
...At this point it's probably a toss-up.
-Regards, T.
61 posted on
02/07/2003 10:31:32 AM PST by
T Lady
(.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
To: RCW2001
Wah, wah Pierre!
Are these people nuts or something? Or just greedy?
...At this point it's probably a toss-up.
-Regards, T.
62 posted on
02/07/2003 10:31:37 AM PST by
T Lady
(.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
To: RCW2001
Hey France:
![](http://membres.lycos.fr/cyberkat74/smileys/tongueass.gif)
66 posted on
02/07/2003 10:39:34 AM PST by
lawgirl
(FREEP Congress- we need Bush's judicial nominees approved!)
To: RCW2001
This is a particularly outrageous action when one considers that the only reason they
have a veto is the absurd fiction that they were a co-equal partner with the United States, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain in defeating the Axis.
It's like giving a permanent veto to Norway. Hell, the Norwegians, who put up a better fight and hanged Quisling by the neck until dead right after their liberation, were more deserving than the French, who rolled over quickly and let Petain off with a prison term.
70 posted on
02/08/2003 10:05:56 AM PST by
steve-b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson