Skip to comments.
France Warns Against War, Hints at Veto
Reuters ^
Posted on 02/07/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by RCW2001
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: RCW2001
This is interesting and I don't see valid reasons for France to have agreed to the Security Council resolution. France is completely out of line because they agreed to the resolution, but they're trying to play games figuring they can do this to the United States because we aren't Iraq. I believe France is concerned with its dealings with Iraq coming to the fore when war happens and Iraq's secrets are revealed. Why doesn't France just admit they find it acceptable for Saddam Hussein to have weapons of mass destruction and continue on with the programs. The French are just sick and we've got to show them they are betraying our country and putting the security of the world at risk due to their OWN GREED and refusal to deal with Iraq and letting Iraq continue on. They are the problem too. We should dig up every American serviceman on French soild, it is a disgrace. That country is a disgrace and we should never offer assistance to them in their own times of national security because they show repeated nonconcern for our own.
To: RCW2001
First Baghdad, then Paris.
Big Food wants the truffle fields siezed to provide a cheap Perigeaux Sauce precursor.
So9
22
posted on
02/07/2003 9:04:16 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: RCW2001
France; The only country to have a monument for each one of its defeats.
To: CatoRenasci
I often wonder how much the decline in the characters of the French and Germans is a result of the destruction of their aristocracies. I think Germany has also suffered greatly from the influx of East Germans into their Government at every level. Not sure the East German Government officials that became part of the United Germany have changed all that much from their days behind the Berlin Wall.
24
posted on
02/07/2003 9:10:20 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: wizardoz
I agree. Nice job by Ollie
To: showme_the_Glory
To all -- any suggestions --Need Help, I want to buy a credible book regarding Frances modern history. From 1900 on, covering WWs, cold war, Nato history etc.
Thanks in Advance.
To: RCW2001
It must truly suck to be an irrelevant, has-been, self-serving, corrupt, decadent country. I can't wait to find out the extent of French "cooperation" with Iraq after we go in and turn on the spotlight of truth.
27
posted on
02/07/2003 9:13:33 AM PST
by
arm958
To: Servant of the Nine; All
First Baghdad, then Paris. I have read a few references in a few online forums to bumper stickers which read: "First Iraq, Then France". Anyone have one and/or know where to get one?
To: PhiKapMom
Ooo, my sympathies. I haven't had a flu shot in years and one year it got me good. I had to crawl to the bathroom, where I enacted scenes from The Exorcist. For days I couldn't eat or drink anything but 7-Up and oranges, for some reason.
29
posted on
02/07/2003 9:16:23 AM PST
by
wizardoz
(I'll show you "imperialist"!)
To: RCW2001
France does not seem to understand the logistical realities of an invasion, doing it while forces are available and in position, before the summer heat, and so forth. They are playing right into Iraq's hands, Iraq knowing full well that if it can only delay things a couple months it probably won't be invaded at all until next year and that the expense and strain of the US keeping forces that long will make the whole project collapse. At which point, France can puff itself up as the big defender of peace, Hussein can keep building up his WMD stockpile and become the leader of anti-American sentiment, and the US can just go crawl under a rock for all the influence it will have in global affairs.
To: bushfamfan
That country is a disgrace and we should never offer assistance to them in their own times of national security because they show repeated nonconcern for our own.I'm with you. Let them eat cake.
31
posted on
02/07/2003 9:18:03 AM PST
by
wizardoz
(I'll show you "imperialist"!)
To: PhiKapMom
What's even stranger about the situation is that France recently had elections which swept the Socialists out of power. Except for their lunatic fringe right, Chirac represents the "conservatives" in France.
Unlike Germany, where their pacifist Chancellor is hugely unpopular, and the conservatives are on the upswing, in France it's not going to get any better than this. In Germany, at least there is hope.
It appears that Europe is going to fracture over this war in Iraq, and it has enormous ramifications.
32
posted on
02/07/2003 9:26:34 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: wizardoz
My tinfoil hat theory. France has no problem with Iraq making a nuke as long as they are in on the oil deals and the US gets totally screwed.
To: KellyAdmirer
France does not seem to understand the logistical realities of an invasion True, and the irony is so thick you could cut it with a bayonet.
To: Charles Martel; Servant of the Nine
"Over the Hills and Far Away" - modern version;(from SHARPE'S EAGLE)Four thousand dollars on the drum,
For those wholl volunteer to come
And enlist to fight the foe today,
Over the hills and far away.
Oer the hills, we will attack
Afghanistan and then Iraq;
George Bush commands and we obey,
Over the hills and far away.
When duty calls me, I must go
To stand and face another foe;
But part of me will always stray
Over the hills and far away.
Oer the hills, from sea to land,
Iraq, and then on to Iran;
George Bush commands and we obey,
Over the hills and far away.
If I should fall to fight no more,
As many comrades did before,
Then ask the pipes and drums to play
"Over the hills and far away".
Oer the hills, pro patria,
Iran and then Arabia;
George Bush commands and we obey,
Over the hills and far away.
Then fall in, lads, behind the drum,
With colours blazing like the sun,
Along the road to come what may,
Over the hills and far away.
Oer the hills we will advance,
Through Belgium, Germany, and France;
George Bush commands and we obey,
Over the hills and far away."
35
posted on
02/07/2003 9:35:01 AM PST
by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
To: RCW2001
On a another post, a FReeper by the name of Mr. B, succintly identified France's reason for not supporting disarming Hussein. He said that much of the Iraqi war material (WMD) will have "Made in France" labels.
To: Dog Gone
On one of the news programs that I was watching, they were discussing that the German Chancellor didn't represent the opinions of a lot of Germans thus his defeat in the last local elections that were held.
On the other hand, they said Chirac and the French were standing together which spoke volumes to me about the French. Scarey to think Chirac considers himself a conservative.
37
posted on
02/07/2003 9:43:47 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: RCW2001
"If the question were put today, France would say no to a resolution authorising the use of force," Apparently the only country the France won't surrender to is the one resposible for it's existence.
38
posted on
02/07/2003 9:44:12 AM PST
by
HumanaeVitae
(If Eminem's music is not crap, then the term 'crap' has no meaning.)
To: Dog Gone
Agreed. France and Germany on one end - the U.K and the rest of Europe on the other.
39
posted on
02/07/2003 9:45:21 AM PST
by
hchutch
("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
To: RCW2001
I hope they do veto. We'll attack anyway along with our real allies, and thereby clearly demonstrate the UN's irrelevance.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson