Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2003 6:15:30 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TroutStalker

How One Soldier's E-Mail
Changed Troops Equipment

By GREG JAFFE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Last July, a few weeks after he got back from Afghanistan, Master Sgt. Rudy Romero wrote a quick e-mail to one of his old commanding officers. "How's everything going sir? Let's get together for lunch. I know a pretty good place if you like Mexican," he began.

He followed that with three pages of advice from his tour in Afghanistan with the Army's 101st Airborne division -- everything from the best gloves to take (fleece from AutoZone) to the best socks (Gore-Tex, available in camping stores). He also told his former boss to ditch the Army-issue ammunition sacks and instead buy bags from London Bridge Trading Co.

The 37-year-old soldier figured that sooner or later his former commander would be deployed to Afghanistan and that sharing his experience might make the tour easier. Little did he know that his military version of "Hints from Heloise" would make its way to the Pentagon's top brass and inspire significant changes in the way the Army is equipping its troops for possible future battles, including Iraq.

Sgt. Romero's old boss, Maj. Frank Sturek, forwarded the note to a couple of friends in his unit. They shot it to a few of their friends, and before Sgt. Romero knew it his e-mail, written in all capital letters, had landed in the in boxes of Army Sgt. Major Jack Tilley, the Army's senior enlisted soldier, and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki, who said he found it fascinating.[Gearing Up Logo]

It didn't stop there. A month after he hit the "send" button, Sgt. Romero got a call from Sgt. Major Tilley telling him that the Army wanted him to go to its U.S. Soldier Systems Center in Natick, Mass., where engineers were busily at work developing the gear that soldiers take into battle. Sgt. Romero grabbed two of his buddies at Fort Campbell, Ky., and headed out a few days later.

Once in Natick, the three were ushered into a theater, where they answered questions and spent two days meeting the 100 or so engineers responsible for designing the clothing and gadgets that soldiers wear or carry into combat. Sgt. Romero had lots of advice for the people who design the Army's tan desert boots, which troops wore in Afghanistan.

Although the boots worked just fine on the soft sands of Iraq, they fell to pieces after a couple of months in Afghanistan, where the ground is rocky. The engineers took note, and the Army is buying new boots with special composite soles that should stand up better in Central Asia.

His biggest complaint was that Army gear weighs too much. "We were easily carrying 80 lbs. Throw on the ruck [Army backpack] and you're sucking," he wrote.

[Master Sgt. Rudy Romero]
Master Sgt. Rudy Romero shows Army nutritionists how he stripped a prepackaged Army meal to make it lighter.

To make their point, the three men explained how soldiers in Afghanistan consumed their Meals Ready to Eat, the plastic-wrapped all-in-one food packets that weigh about two pounds and last around three years. Before going into battle they "field stripped" the meals to cut down on their carrying weight. "We kept the high carb stuff for energy and threw out everything else," Sgt. Romero told the nutritionist responsible for developing the meals.

Based in part on his suggestions, the Army is designing a lightweight Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol Ration.

The three raised another practical concern: Too many of the Army's new gadgets use different kinds of batteries, further increasing the load. Some soldiers, Sgt. Romero explained, buy commercial GPS locators from camping stores and discard their military-issue devices simply because the civilian ones use the same batteries as their night-vision goggles. The engineers, who had heard similar complaints before, said they would keep that in mind but made no promises.

Today Sgt. Romero's e-mail is still posted on several military Web sites and in a half-dozen or so Internet chat rooms. The message tells a couple of bone-chilling war stories, including one about the time a 2,000-pound, satellite-guided bomb veered off course and nearly killed his company. "It didn't go off by a sheer miracle I'm sure," he wrote.

But mostly the e-mail focuses on matters far more mundane. For example, Sgt. Romero tells his former commander not to bother with Army-issue winter gloves. They are warm and waterproof, but soldiers can't pull a rifle trigger when wearing them, which is a big problem in combat. Aviator gloves are good, he writes. Even better are the fleece gloves sold at AutoZone.

And the best munitions for clearing out a cave? "Bring lots of Thermite grenades and C-4," he suggests. His unit, not accustomed to clearing caves, never seemed to have enough.

Finally, he advises his colleagues to bring iodine tablets to purify water -- something U.S. soldiers did for decades, but his unit, unaccustomed to the rigors of war, left behind at Fort Campbell. "We've lost a lot of our needed field craft," he laments in the e-mail.

Sgt. Romero's e-mail is full of praise for the training he received before he was deployed and for the troops who fought at his side. "Soldiers did great. You can always depend on them. They are extremely brave and want to fight," he concludes. "They'll do it just like we teach them."

Write to Greg Jaffe at greg.jaffe@wsj.com

2 posted on 02/07/2003 6:18:56 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
The MOLLE pack has proven to be a POS and is destined for the dung heap.
4 posted on 02/07/2003 6:31:42 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
Here is the problem. Laptop last 2 hours from continous use, PDA 1 hour from continuous use. The displays will not work at temperatures below -4 degrees F. Wireless interface is not secure. Most commercial applications involve email, composition of email response and short access to internet for five minutes every hour during the work day. Military users need color graphics for maps, real time info for navigation and positioning. The battery and power needs will exceed the ones that exist in commercial devices. The military desire 12 to 72 hours of continuous use before resupply and operations down to -40 degrees F. By the time the commercial device is modified to meet those requirements, the size and weight will increase dramaticly. We have not even dealt with the complications of modifying commercial devices which lack secure low chance detection/interception capabilities for the battlefield environment (i.e the enemy can detect and jam many commercial wireless devices).
5 posted on 02/07/2003 6:52:52 AM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
Maybe there wouldn't be so much concern about the equipment being "heavy," if infantry physical performance norms didn't have to be dumbed down for women.
8 posted on 02/07/2003 7:21:59 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Squantos; harpseal
Perhaps of interest.
9 posted on 02/07/2003 7:28:05 AM PST by Joe Brower (http://www.joebrower.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
Although it doesn't show in the illustration you provided there is one acessory to both the current and projected infantryman's rifle that is still considered crucial, the bayonet. In spite of all the Dick Tracy - Star Wars technology the planners know that in the end it often comes down to sharp pointees at close range.
10 posted on 02/07/2003 7:46:54 AM PST by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
The figure "eighty pounds" seems to be universal across time for a grunt's fighting weight -- (altho I know special ops troops routinely go out the door with 50% more than that.) When the redcoats got off the boats on Charlestown shore for their little ruck-march up to Lexington & Concord, their loads were the same: eighty pounds.

Most of them came back a lot lighter, of course! And faster.
12 posted on 02/07/2003 9:00:41 AM PST by Snickersnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
What's that crappy powder-fag blue helmet on the right doing in the picture ???
29 posted on 02/07/2003 7:50:31 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
Great Topic!

The first WSJ article by ANTONIO REGALADO is simplistic and riddled with errors and irrelevant remarks,

- Freeze dried foods? MRE's contain few freeze dried components.

- Three color desert camo uniforms replace the Gulf War "Chocolate Chip" camo pattern. So what? Big deal!

- G.I. Canteen replaced by a pack mounted water "bladder system"? How dumb! The good old 1 quart canteen with a cover, cup, stove base and trioximine fuel tablets works fine. Beats the heck out of all the fragile and heavy backpack stoves and mess kits one sees at the camping stores.

The second WSJ article referencing the Master Sargent was much better. I'm just a hunter, fisherman and camper, but here's my observations about military field gear and what I use when stomping around the woods chasing turkeys, ducks and geese.

MRE's are -way- to heavy for a person on foot. They are ridiculously heavy. Keep the main meal and lose all the cardboard packaging. Drop all the veggie and pasta side dishes. Keep the crackers, jelly and the peanut butter. The catalytic heaters are neat, but the old canteen cup and trioximine fuel tablets work fine. MRE's are OK for armored or helicopter troops but too heavy for ground pounders. Foot soldiers need freeze dried meat dishes and high carb ready to eat snacks. Veggies and pasta only add weight to your pack and to your waistline.

The GI A.L.I.C.E. pack system is too heavy also, especially with the pack frame which is needed for any load over twenty pounds. A modern internal frame pack is lighter and more comfortable with a 40 pound load. It also is much more stable. I don't know much about the M.O.L.L.E. system but it looks like some flimsy commercial stuff passed on by a "favorite son" contractor.

The battery thing is a point well taken. Batteries will always fail and the correct size battery will never be available when you really really need them. Using more than one or two types of baterries is a logistical nightmare. Fuel cells are an up and comming technology that may have some merit.

Lastly one of the lessons learned from Afganistan was that most of our troops are twenty pounds overweight. In mountainous terrain or in the desert all those extra pounds become a real liability. Most of the Brit's, and our SEALS thrived in Afganistan while our "Mountain" troops and Airborne fared less well. Diet and training are essential to fit troops.





41 posted on 02/08/2003 10:35:39 AM PST by Milwaukee_Guy (Stop the Axis of Weasels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
What, no thermoptic camoflague and female cyborg assassins?
47 posted on 02/08/2003 11:13:04 AM PST by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
Bump
55 posted on 02/08/2003 4:58:26 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TroutStalker
I wonder if there will ever be house to house fighting in Baghdad. As I recall one could merely divert the river. Without water the enemy would last about a week.
66 posted on 02/08/2003 7:52:53 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson