Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Environmentalists kill. Here we have some of our best and brightest killed because politicians and bureaucrats are afraid to stand up to the zero tolerance crowd and say CFC's are necessary. As a result, seven people are dead, but this is a drop in the bucket. How many people are dead for want of DDT? How many people die each year because of CAFE standards? It is time for the public to realize that the feel good, half-witted measures forced down our throats by the environmental Nazis have a real cost not just in dollars, but in terms of lives.
1 posted on 02/07/2003 5:27:05 AM PST by Tom D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tom D.
So why didn't NASA put it's collective foot down? Blame the greenies, but I didn't see NASA kicking and screaming.
2 posted on 02/07/2003 5:28:43 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
bump
3 posted on 02/07/2003 5:29:11 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
From the Data
4 posted on 02/07/2003 5:32:36 AM PST by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
I was under the impression the freon was used to "glue" the foam to the tank. This article say's the foam was made with freon. Any experts out there to clear this up?
5 posted on 02/07/2003 5:34:24 AM PST by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.; TLBSHOW; Fred Mertz; Jael; BureaucratusMaximus
In 2001, the EPA exempted NASA from the CFC phase-out: The shuttle's use wasn't important. Most CFC use was in consumer products (including air conditioners, refrigerators, aerosol cans, etc.). Yet NASA didn't return to the safer Freon-based foam. Instead, it continued to risk tile damage and disaster with PC-foam.

Hmmm. Smoking foam?

I heard on the radio this morning that the investigation is being transferred to a body independent of NASA. Somebody was listening.

11 posted on 02/07/2003 6:03:26 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Death by Environmentalism?
14 posted on 02/07/2003 6:39:52 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.; Gracey
Gracey, I stand corrected.

Tom, see this post about the use of the "environmentally-friendly" solvents and adhesives causing O-ring blowby on the boosters. This has been covered up to a much greater extent than the ET foam, as a google.com search will confirm for you.

If you will continue to read in that thread, there is evidence that Marshall Space Flight Center wrote the specifications for these new cleaners so that only one company could qualify.

It would be interesting to know to whom these companies made political contributions, if any.

19 posted on 02/07/2003 7:27:37 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Well Democrats say that Republicans murder old people and children, so turn about is fair play. Democrats and wacko environmentalists, lead by none other than Bill Clinton/Al Gore and their radical, left wing administration, murdered seven Shuttle Columbia astronauts. Have the authorities taken Big Bill into custody yet?
21 posted on 02/07/2003 7:42:24 AM PST by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Here we have some of our best and brightest killed because politicians and bureaucrats are afraid to stand up to the zero tolerance crowd and say CFC's are necessary.

Enviroweenies got Columbia, in all probability.

The EPA exempted the ET foam from CFC restrictions. Yet NASA didn't take the obvious step of going back to Freon use to correct an identified problem.

Political correctness uber alles.

22 posted on 02/07/2003 7:53:35 AM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
1994-05-04 Advances in Science

"The Air Force is reacting to the EPA ban on CFC's by replacing
them in the cooling systems of the intercontinental (ballistic)
missiles with 2 to 10 nuclear warheads on board. If they are ever
fired, it will be an environmentally friendly nuclear holocaust,
not threatening the Ozone layer."
-- Access to Energy, July 1993

23 posted on 02/07/2003 8:40:55 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Yet NASA didn't return to the safer Freon-based foam. Instead, it continued to risk tile damage and disaster with PC-foam..... Now, in what smacks of cover-up, NASA claims the Columbia disaster has become a scientific mystery. It says computer modeling fails to show foam striking the thermal tiles could cause catastrophic damage - apparently ignoring that flaking foam substantially penetrated thermal tiles on an earlier flight.

Wow. BUMP

25 posted on 02/07/2003 10:11:19 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Never A Straight Answer.
27 posted on 02/07/2003 11:16:01 AM PST by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Great! Feed the paranoids!
28 posted on 02/07/2003 11:23:51 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Well ... the new independent panel to investigate this mess has now taken over - and I read a comment which stated that all events at lift-off have been placed back on the table, including the suspect foam.
29 posted on 02/07/2003 11:53:26 AM PST by CyberAnt ( Yo! Syracuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Ping.
30 posted on 02/07/2003 1:39:13 PM PST by MrConfettiMan (One Year+ Low Grade Brain Tumor Survivor - http://www.mcmprod.com/jj)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tom D.
Up to fifteen inches long, up to 1.5 inches deep.

Nah, this 20" x 16" x 6" piece of insullation obviously had nothing to do with damage to the wing. LMAO

The call for a independent commission is right on target!

32 posted on 02/07/2003 8:31:23 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
bttt
37 posted on 02/07/2003 10:46:17 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson