Replies

I get cold sweats when I think of the Democrats one day recapturing power. The threat will be a joke to Democrats until there's a mass die off in a U.S. city from a CBN attack. Thereafter, the Democrat spin will be that the attack, however unfortunate, is just desserts for U.S. support for Israel.

I keep thinking of "High Noon".

And when this is all over, I want Bush to throw the tin star in the dirt.

Screw these people. I will never forgive them. UN out of the US. Leftist appeasers out of Congress. Smirking celebrities out of money.

I'm not one to worry about UN acquiescence in this, but somebody on our side has to make the following case to the American people. What do you mean by UN backing?

If you mean the Security Council then you are saying that France, Russia, and China are the UN. Scenario to consider: The Security Council votes 10-5 to support the US. Russia, France, and China vote NO. Do we have UN support?

The Dems talk like the UN is some New England Town Meeting. UN support has nothing to do with the nations of the world. It's the realm of the permanent members who decide who lives or dies.

Another scenario to consider.: The Council votes 7 to 5 with three abstentions, Russia, France, and China, to back Bush. Do we have UN support then?

Final scenario for the DEMS.Iraq's threat is objective and quantifiable. It exists or does not exist without any refernce to the United Nations. If DEMS believe that an attack is acceptable with UN backing why not without it? The threat posed is exactly the same. Answer the question DEMS. Does the threat exist or not?