Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinclair
"NO! His reputation as a pedophile is based on the FACT that he paid a family of a child not to tell the world what perverse acts he did to said child."

Maybe he paid to keep snoopy noses out of his life. Do you know for sure? Were you in bed with Michael and the kiddies?

17 posted on 02/07/2003 7:36:49 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew (It'll all come out in the wash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
The use of the word “MAYBE” in your statement indicates that you are speculating. The use of the word “FACT” in my statement indicates I am not.

I am eagerly awaiting your interjection of facts into this discussion.


18 posted on 02/07/2003 8:02:17 AM PST by sinclair (Hey, I just come in here for nothin'... Hope I'm not wastin' anybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Be advised, readin' it ain't pretty...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/mjdec1.html

Bootyist
19 posted on 02/07/2003 8:10:00 AM PST by bootyist-monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Have you read the legal complaint?

It's credible on it's face, unlike the self-deluded narcissist that was on view last night.

Also, another FR forum member has seen a piece of evidence that convinced her that the reason he settled was because he'd been caught.

I don't know what she saw, but, if I had to guess about a piece of evidence that wouldn't send him to jail but would convince me he was guilty of child molestation, it would be somwthing along the lines of a tape showing on-the-mouth-kissing - not enough to convict without the testimony of the boy, but enough to corroborate his complaint.

But let's pretend he got a bum rap and paid out the 20 mil blackmail to make it go away.

He is not psychosexually normal. He is obsessed with children and childhood. He has abnormal man/child relationships.

Alright then, forget his misuse of other people's children to meet his emotional needs.

How can anyone condone him buying children and deliberately cutting their mother off from them? The one he married (because of the legal benefits of presumption of paternity - no adoption or paternity testing needed) he says is a great person. How could he deprive his own children of the maternal bond? He snatched one, placenta and all, and according to him, ran out of the hosptital with the newborn!

He's sad, sick and twisted in any case.

I do feel sorry for him. But I feel sorrier for the children he uses for his own selfish ends.
32 posted on 02/07/2003 10:13:08 AM PST by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson